This is a subtitle for your new post
FOR LATEST UPDATE OF FINDINGS, GO HERE.
Large institutions like Massey University are built on a foundation of inertia and arrogance.
They've seen "disgruntled clients" before. Their internal legal and risk teams are trained to view individual complaints as "noise" that will eventually run out of steam, money, or emotional energy.
To a bureaucrat, a flurry of emails and technical arguments is dismissed – generally with bemusement – as "antics" or “a difficult case”.
They have a wall of bureaucracy as thick as a nuclear fall-out shelter built around their institutions, populated by a large team of legal and governance-type personnel with plenty of redundancy built in to ensure against any accountability.
They assume they have more lawyers, more resources, and more time in their average "day at the office" than the average pet owner client or other individual that might need accountability from that institution. They're got almost limitless capacity to deploy the quintessential public "service" "5D" weapons of Delay, Defer, Deny, Defend, and finally (when the complainant is so fatigued from the marathon stonewalling), Dismissed.
They assume that if they just keep restricting access and obfuscating the facts, the seeker of truth will eventually tire out.
But those nuclear fall-out shelter-thick walls?
They're going to need them when it comes to the case of the malpractice and the plot to kill my dog to cover it up (i.e. terminate the evidence rather than give him the chance to recover from the beyond irresponsible and arguably intentional clinical crime they perpetrated against him . . . and thus, me, as his adoring owner).
So, while the suits at Massey sit back highly bemused at what they’re no doubt, at this early stage, dismissing as my “antics”, what they're yet to realise is two critical elements of this case:
1) Actually, Massey, no, it’s NOT OK to coerce me into killing my dog under false pretences.
And because what you have done has had and will, in perpetuity have, an irreversible, permanent-impact on my life, my gut and my heart, with your extraordinary degree of sheer evil seared into my psyche and my memory, I’m here to make sure your well-deserved reputational consequences are neither lightly dismissable nor fleeting, either.
2) When dealing with a pet owner like me, with the depth of the bond I had with my dog, Harry, and the manner in which you duped me into participating with you in the ultimate betrayal of his innocence and his trust by performing what I now know to have been a completely unnecessary killing simply to get rid of the evidence of your malpractice . . . "bemusement" at my reaction upon uncovering the truth, you are going to soon discover, will not be a sustainable strategy.
You killed the wrong woman's dog. Your malpractice and the ethically incomprehensible deception and hard core tactics you perpetrated upon me not only to coerce me into allowing you to kill Harry, but also to have me participate in his truly awful, and truly unnecessary final scene . . . they're not leaving the public gaze now, any more than they will ever leave me.
You Took from Me the Thing I Loved Most In All This World . . . Unnecessarily, Under False Pretences & to Cover Up Your Incomprehensible Multiple Levels of Malpractice & Your Conscienceless Acts of Malfeasance (And Was It Also Revenge, Massey?)
Firstly, I have nothing left to lose. You robbed me of the thing I loved and adored most in all the world. And you did it in the most heinous manner possible. Losing Harry at any time in the future would have been difficult in the circumstances of a natural death, or an unavoidable, genuine “euthanasia”.
But when you made me your accomplice in his early and completely unnecessary death following your catastrophically overdosed convenience-sedating of him, by obscuring from me the clinical reality of his actual condition, you didn't just create an angry, grieving owner.
No, you created an international whistleblower.
So for the moment, you may be sitting comfortably behind what you consider to be your (self-appointed) international “gold standard" façade . . . but when it is progressively exposed as exactly that – a façade – you may well eventually see how fickle institutional loyalty can be. That is, when there’s well-deserved reputational risk accruing to your national and international associations.
You might find that despite the decades of institutional networks and the regulatory “old boys’ club” modus operandi that traditionally goes with all of that . . . that there nonetheless comes a point at which even the most entrenched loyalty evaporates when the “gold standard” fades and that association becomes a
systemic reputational risk.
It might take a while. But I'm not going anywhere.
So, to the Massey suits, to the Companion Animal 'Hospital' management, and to "Steffi" the vet who achieved her "objective" - eliminating Harry and the evidence of the malpractice that his live body risked uncovering had he been presented to any external veterinaria - and to the Veterinary Council of New Zealand, whom I strongly suspect will do all they can to protect the industry-side parties rather than prosecute them :
Enjoy your moment of sitting with a collective smirk as you consider what you currently view as the "powerless", "voiceless" status of this pet owner . . . because there will shortly come the next phase of my investigative and revelatory endeavours and I predict that your period of bemusement will come to an end (rather like Harry's life).
To "Steffi", most particularly: Yes, you achieved your "objective" at the unnecessary cost of Harry’s life and my peace of mind for the rest of mine . . . but you will find that you will not have been able to hide your strategies, decisions and actions indefinitely.
In short, I’m not going away. I’m going global.
I owe it to Harry, to myself, and to other vulnerable pets and their devoted owners.
I also owe it to the more principled vets who genuinely are "morally injured' by the clinic and veterinary corporate environments whose cultures act as petri dishes in which they knowingly grow this kind of dangerous toxicity and its deeply regrettable and irreversible outcomes.
Other News, Reviews & Commentary









