Trump's 'Brutal' Email to Federal Employees Might Be A Good Example for Our PM to Follow
Jordan Kelly • 30 January 2025

Our PM Word-Mimmicks Trump A Lot Lately . . . How About Mimicking this Trump Action?

U.S. President Trump issued a stunning email to the entire Federal work force this week:  "Put 'RESIGN' in the subject line and hit 'Send' if you want to go'.


The email gave all employees across the entire Federal government workforce until February 6 (10 days from their time of receipt) to decide if they wanted to take him up on a redundancy offer that would see them free to leave immediately, with full pay until September 30.


But if they choose to stay, the email makes clear, they'd be working in the office and NOT from home; they will be expected to display a standard of excellence in their role; and there is no guarantee that either their job or their entire agency/department won't be axed in the future.


The email is apparently very similar to one sent to Twitter employees in 2022 by tech mogul Elon Musk, now appointed by Trump to head his new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative.


Entitled "A Fork In The Road", here are some highlights surrounding the shock missive:


  • The new Government will focus on four pillars:


  • A return to physical presence office culture.
  • A high-performance environment that demands excellence.
  • A more reduced, streamlined and flexible workforce that will include downsizings.
  • A high, non-negotiable standard of trust, loyalty and reliability.


  • DOGE's official Twitter/X account says


"DOGE is saving the Federal Government approximately $1 billion a day, mostly from stopping the hiring of people into unnecessary positions, deletion of DEI and stopping improper payments to foreign organizations, all consistent with the President's Executive Orders. A good start, although this number needs to increase to >$3 billion a day."


Even the uber-leftist BBC seems to have been left momentarily stunned and without its by-immediate-impulse vitriolic commentary an how awful Trump's latest move is.


If only Wellington would some day reflect the new, intended Washington under Trump.


Ed's opinion:  A very effective way of making sure that the heads of Government agencies don't simply fire the more politically expendable staffers and keep on their high-paid but unproductive cronies. We might be divested of our own "swamp creatures" . . . characters who have nothing better to do with their taxpayer-funded time than to carry on like this.

Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 10 October 2025
Whether Contemptuous & Corrupt, Sheer Incompetent, Or 'All of the Above' You Just Prevented This (And Probably More Than One) Ratepayer from Exercising Their Legal Right to Vote
by Jordan Kelly 29 September 2025
BAD, Tech On Road, VERY VERY BAD !! Did You Ever Hear of That Classic Retailer Ad, 'It's The Putting It Right That Counts' ? Obviously Not.
by Jordan Kelly 8 September 2025
And so to the next instalment of the Masterton District Council's Malarkey . . .
by Jordan Kelly 31 August 2025
Before You Vote for More of the Same Contempt from Your Local 'Elected Representatives', See If Any Care About YOU, the Ratepayer . . . Because When You Need Them, You Might Be Highly Disappointed.
by Jordan Kelly 17 August 2025
'Where There Is No Vision, the People Shall Perish' . . . Proverbs 29:18
by Jordan Kelly 13 August 2025
If I owned a retail business, I'd hire these two away in a heartbeat . . .
by Jordan Kelly 13 August 2025
The Clown Show that Dominated Parliament on this Day . . .
by Jordan Kelly 22 July 2025
Definition of 'Corruption' MUST Include Dishonest, Seedy, Cruel, Underhanded & Highly Damaging Practices of Ministers & Ministry Management and Personnel
by Jordan Kelly 19 July 2025
When Will You Wake Up to the Biological Impacts of Your Wi Fi Router & Your Smart Phone etc . . . (and just so you know your editor isn't a hypocrite: I manage to live without both . . . yeah, WOW, eh?)
by Jordan Kelly 17 July 2025
Taking It to the Powers That Maybe Shouldn't Be?
Show More