LGNZ Membership . . . So Is It VfM for Ratepayers or ISN'T It?
Jordan Kelly • 26 July 2024

Response from MDC Mayor . . . Is Membership of Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) Giving Ratepayers Any Bang for Our Buck? YOU Decide.

So, as a ratepayer of Masterton District Council (MDC), I wrote and asked the Mayor, Gary Caffell, what ROI (Return on Investment) we, the district's ratepayers, are getting for the chunk of our rates that go towards MDC's participation in this (to me) questionable organisation. See my earlier articles here and here.


After an initial "we see value in our membership" (and that was it) type of response, I asked for a bit more detail:


"Thanks, Mr Mayor, but would you kindly provide a (bullet point) list of the specific benefits to ratepayers (i.e. to ratepayers, specifically), with detailed elaboration on each of the bullet pointed benefits."

 

I have now received this further response: 

 

"Examples of where Local Government New Zealand provides value to Masterton District Council include:


·       Their (LGNZ) advocating for local government on issues with Central Government:

o  An example of our (MDC's) recently using this includes recent discussion on the Fast Track bill.


·       Accessing research they have commissioned for local government purposes:

o  An example of our recently using this includes the rates information they recently released.


·       Using them to amplify our local views as part of their ongoing relationship with the government ministers:

o  An example of our recently using this includes the meeting they run for elected members around local zones (e.g. Rural & Provincial / Wellington Zone 4).


·       Using networking opportunities they provide us with other local authorities and with central government:

o  An example of our recently using this includes those meeting (sic) mentioned above, the LGNZ conference, and subject-specific webinars.


·       The Mayors' Task Force for Jobs, an initiative we have seen success with to help boost employment and training opportunities for young people across our district:

o  This is an annual program, which saw us recently recognising the achievements of 58 local young people and 32 businesses in July.


·       Accessing professional development programs they have created for local government organisations:

o  An example of our recently using this includes the Good Governance Guide for newly elected members.

     

·       Using LGNZ templates and guides:

An example of our recently using this includes their standing order and code of conduct templates.


"A full overview of the services they provide is available at their website here: https://www.lgnz.co.nz/

 

"Last year’s membership cost was $42,686.

 

"For future reference, as a journalist it may be useful for you to direct any future queries through to our team on media@mstn,govt.nz."

 

My response:


Thanks, Mr Mayor. I appreciate that you have responded.


However:


1)  I had also asked for the following disclosure, as this type of expense category often substantially exceeds an organisation's annual membership fee, and certainly, combined, presents the need for an ROI evaluation that takes the full picture of costs into account. NB:  I had asked, "Would you also kindly disclose both the hard costs and all associated soft costs e.g. the travel etc costs of Councilors, Council management and other staff traveling to attend events)?" After all, many ratepayers are struggling just to heat their homes and keep food on the table right now, so we want to be assured that we're not funding junkets.

 

2)  I note that you have a media team. Really? A Council administering to a Local Government Area the size of ours justifies the expense of media liaison personnel?


3)  I must decline your offer to liaise through your media team. Yes, I'm a journalist. But, in this case and as regards any MDC-related request for information and disclosure, I am first and foremost a ratepayer of your Council.


4)  Further to all of the above, if I take the time to produce an article or series thereof, I intend for them to be quality productions . . . not that to which I would be limited if I were to use the inch-deep, sanitised and controlled, "one set of supplied questions only" option of working through media gatekeepers performing the role of an information release filtration system to a Council that has an obligation to be forthcoming and fully transparent with its ratepayers.


For an example of the difference, I refer you to this very worthwhile interview with your Councillor colleague, Cr Tim Nelson, and to the forthcoming series with a specific Parliamentarian, with whom I will be conducting deep, probing and high-value interviews over forthcoming weeks.

 

Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 4 June 2025
Hey PowerCo: I Do NOT Appreciate You Giving Out My Email Address to Research Companies . . . Especially Those Who Treat YOUR Customers with Utter Contempt (& Spam Them)
by Jordan Kelly 3 June 2025
Why You Should Teach ALL Employees to Value Your Brand
by Jordan Kelly 26 May 2025
Ministry of Social Development Employee Sprays Around A Client's Private Information, then Sends It to A Journalist 
by Jordan Kelly 25 May 2025
Learn the Plays & Ploys of New Zealand Government Agencies to Beat Them At Their Own Sordid Game Since starting 'The Customer & The Constituent' back in January 2024, I've been learning things about the New Zealand political scene as it relates to Ministers and their Ministries (or agencies or bureaus), and also the behind-the-curtain Parliamentary machinations related to them. Things I almost wish now that I didn't know. But they're things that, for better or for worse, ALL New Zealanders should know, about the way the New Zealand Government and its "public service" really operates. If you don't know how things operate in reality (not just the PR fluff on their websites) in some of these big-name agencies that we are forced to deal with in one way or another, at some time or another, depending on the need or issue you're attempting to have solved or resolved, you could go around in ever-increasing frustrating circles for weeks, months and even years. Before getting absolutely nowhere . And the worst part is: That's the intention . The 5 D's 1) Delay 2) Defer 3) Deny 4) Defend 5) Dismissed They're largely self-explanatory, but it's an absolute playbook that they stick to, and apparently senior agency bureaucrats and Ministers and their staff are taught this as a rite of passage into parliamentary and career public "roles" . . . and then are sworn to secrecy over it, in a manner that almost has "Eyes Wide Shut" secret society overtones to it. You NEVER refer to the '5 D's' outside of the walls of inner sanctums. However, I'd add two more "D"s to their list: The sixth: Deaf (as in, Ignore). The seventh: Dumb .. And oh my goodness, let me count the ways (which I will do in further articles in this Series, in specific, detailed and named examples). So between your introduction herein to the 'D's', and my ongoing and, I hope, enlightening, series for your continuing and essential edification regarding How Wellington Really Works, I trust that you'll end up knowing how to deal with this sordid scene in a more strategic manner, for a less infuriating time, and maybe even with an outcome. Although there's no guarantee that any "outcome" won't be no outcome. Because that's almost always their intention. Oh, and I do hope that my pieces actually do become an ongoing series, because they do "hit men" (of sorts), too. Yeah, really. Paid generously (with your money, by the way) to "remove" "difficult" ( their words; not mine) individuals. Like me. Stay tuned. See you again shortly. I hope. (PS: I think a feel a book coming on.) COMING NEXT : A drill-down on each of the 'D's. And next up after that: The detailed argument I'll put to the private sector on why hiring an ex-bureaucrat is a very bad idea ( Hint: You might think it gives you in-house lobbyist power and back-door influence, but the price you'll pay is the '5D' customer service anti-culture they'll foster throughout your organisation. Even IF you keep them away from the frontline, it will happen by osmosis anyway. And faster than you think. The worst part? The longer you keep them, the more irreversible the damage they'll seed in your culture. Which then hits your brand. And so on. So, to C-suites everywhere, this will be a read you NEED .
by Jordan Kelly 25 May 2025
Thousands Sign Up to 'Better Wellington' Movement, Seeking Urgent Cessation to Unaffordable Rates, Economic Decay and 'Wrong Direction' of City Council
by Jordan Kelly 20 May 2025
To the Silly Old Placard-Waving (& Terrorist-Supporting) Fools . . . As Seen Daily On the Corner of Chapel & Perry Streets in Masterton
by Jordan Kelly 18 May 2025
** READERS: SEE UPDATE AT END OF ARTICLE. - The Ed. ** Dear MDC Management, Do You Have Any Standards for Your Call Centre Contractors?
by Jordan Kelly 15 May 2025
Being Known As the Woman Who Introduced 'C---' into the New Zealand Parliament, Wasn't A Smart Long-Term Strategy
by Jordan Kelly 14 May 2025
Cheap Trumps Standards, Ethics & Compassion . . . Apparently
by Jordan Kelly 13 May 2025
A Massive Upside IF It's Done Right . . . and An Unrecoverable Downside It It's Not
Show More