Seniors Struggling: Grey Power Reveals Grim Reality of A Problem That's Worsened Over the Decades
Jordan Kelly • 25 July 2024

Do we pay the rates, turn the heaters on, or have a proper meal this week?

That’s the decision a disturbingly large and ever-increasing percentage of New Zealand’s seniors sector is having to make.


According to Grey Power’s new National President Gayle Chambers, the situation is a whole lot more dire than is being recognised . . . including by those who should be recognising it.


“The cost-of-living crisis is affecting everyone, for sure,” she says. “But we’re talking about a sector of our society that was already struggling . . . and when I say struggling, I really do mean struggling.


“Most people not in some way impacted, or observing those impacted, have very little concept, if any, of the absolutely pitiful situation many older New Zealanders are immersed in on a daily basis.”


Chambers says that, “just by way of example” and particularly shamefully, homelessness among even the very elderly, not only exists but is increasing.


‘Nowhere Near Enough Even to Cover the Very Basics’


“Seniors get a fortnightly pension – for which they’re grateful – but it’s nowhere near enough to cover their ever-rising basic costs, and more and more, those for whom government support is their only income, are facing choices like whether they allow themselves to heat at least one room in their house, or whether it’s more important for them to have a nutritious meal rather than yet another feed of baked beans on toast.”


Chambers says a single person on the pension would receive approximately $1000 a fortnight “in their hand” or about $26,000 per year.


Admittedly, while the Ministry of Social Development will – on a case-by-case basis – add an “accommodation allowance” of a further (up to) $165 per week for someone living in Auckland or, at the other end of the scale, (up to) $70 per week for someone living in Greymouth, “it doesn’t come close to reality, let alone to allow anyone to live in any degree of even modest comfort.


‘If They’re Even Lucky Enough to FIND A Place to Rent . . . ’


“Assuming you were lucky enough to even find a place to rent for under $500 per week (and it wouldn’t exactly be flash digs), that’s your entire pension gone on rent. If you own your home, your rates might be, say, $3600 (that’s this year’s average rates bill in Blenheim where I live, by way of a random example), and you’ve got home maintenance costs on top of that, to say nothing of the position you’d be in, if you were still trying to pay off a mortgage.”


(According to one general information website, a retiree needs a minimum $734,450 nest egg to enable them to retire at age 65. But again, that’s based on completely unrealistic total annual living costs of only $25,000.)


“The sad fact is that many seniors don’t own their own home and do live in rented accommodation,” Chambers points out. “And if they can’t get council-owned or Housing New Zealand-owned accommodation, then, seniors are indeed faced with paying phenomenal rents.”

 

Feeding Their Pets Before Themselves


Some people actually choose to feed their pets before themselves, says Chambers.


It’s a particularly important point, she stresses, because loneliness is one of the other major “plagues” of the seniors sector and very specifically, the elderly of that broader cohort.


“Many just couldn’t live without their pets, and what a statement it is on our society that people are so alone and so forgotten and their circumstances continue to be so ignored by each successive government, that they have to make a decision like that.


“But the simple things in life, that we thought we could look forward to in our older years . . . things as simple as going to the movies, even on a Super Tuesday special . . . it’s that or a haircut this quarter, or a vet appointment if we could ever have actually afforded that.”


The Cost-Induced Social Isolation Is Extreme


The social isolation for the many seniors in this situation can be extreme.


“Because they can’t afford to go out and socialise, they’re often experiencing depression, when this has never been an experience of their ‘earning’ years.


“It can be a complete loss of identity,” she explains. “All of a sudden, you’re just this person struggling to make ends meet, whereas once you had options, you were part of society, you had opportunities for self-expression and, in whatever way you wanted to, to contribute to society.


“You had a life and you could still live your purpose.


“But now . . . now you’ve been stripped of all your choices, and increasingly also stripped of your dignity, and it’s already reached the point where the economic consequences are such that many seniors are being stripped of their actual health.


According to the 2018 census results, there were 819,600 people aged 65 years and over in New Zealand. By 2034 it is estimated there will be 1.2 million.


Grey Power – An Organisation with A History of Formidable Achievements


Grey Power New Zealand is an advocacy organisation for anyone in the 50+ age band.


It’s an organisation with two distinct arms i.e.:


  • Seventy-two local representative District-based associations (52 in the North Island and 20 in the South Island), each autonomous but affiliated to Grey Power at the National level. At this District level, the emphasis of activities is on lobbying local government and local Members of Parliament to highlight and address issues specific to the seniors sector in that District.

 

“Grey Power Hokitika, for example, has a lot of seniors who are struggling for food, so they’ve set up a facility within their building (that they fortunately own) – where members can simply take staple items (e.g. bread and tinned food).

 

“Grey Power Marlborough, by contrast, is currently running a seminar series for members and the general public on specific information gaps related to aged care preparedness e.g. why you need an Enduring Power of Attorney arrangement, why you need a Will, and advanced care planning such as thinking about how you’re going to pay for your funeral and whether you actually want one.”

 

  • At the Federation level is a Board made up of 11 people, including four that hold Executive portfolios – the President, the Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary. Seven of these Board members are nominated as Zone representatives.


According to its website, “Grey Power is a voluntary organisation founded in February 1986 by a group of superannuitants protesting against the imposition of a surcharge on New Zealand Superannuation.”


One of the organisation’s first major, flagship achievements was when it successfully lobbied the government of the day, i.e. National under Robert Muldoon, to abolish means-testing of superannuation.


“Grey Power first started as the Auckland Superannuitants’ Association, with its founders very vocal in their resistance to the surcharge. At that time, there was a media campaign against the Government of the day, so meetings were well publicised and attracted a media presence which meant the movement quickly spread and further Associations formed in other areas around New Zealand. The protest gained momentum and the surcharge was abolished.”


Its achievements in more recent years have been both substantial and significant, including but certainly not limited to:


-       Lowered doctor’s fees.

 

-       The dropping of pharmacy prescription charges.

 

-       The appointment of an Aged Care Commissioner.

 

-       Spot audits on rest homes.

 

-       Super Gold card free public transport between 10am and 3pm.

 

-       Security doors on pensioner flats.

 

Earlier achievements have included:


-       The phasing out of NZ Superannuation asset testing (“means testing”).

 

-       Winter Energy Payment.

 

-       Rates Rebate Scheme indexed to CPI.

 

-       Rates Rebate Scheme extension to include retirement village residents.

 

-       Code of Practice and other improved regulations for rest homes.

 

-       Removal of spousal deduction of NZ Super entitlement (Sections 187-191 of the Social Security Act 2018, formerly Section 70).

 

-       Annual clothing allowance for grandparents raising grandchildren.

 

-       Increased funding for glaucoma operations.

 

-       Hearing aid subsidy increased. 

Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 21 April 2025
AI & Robotics Expert Provides Commentary on Skinny's New 'Brand Ambassador'
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
Err . . . No Conflict of Interest Here, At All?
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
You Know It's Bad When Even Mainstream Medical Journals Are Forced to Report On It
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
More on the BUPA international chain of houses-of-horror . . .
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I've Been Tracking Abuse-in-Aged-Care-Facilities for A While Now . . . and Something HAS to Be Done About this Almighty Horror Show
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I'm SO Glad I Manage to Survive Without A Cell Phone . . .
by Jordan Kelly 5 March 2025
Breathing in Foul-Smelling Emissions from Over the Fence? House Filling up with Toxic Fumes? Getting Your Washing Smoked Out? Here Are Your Rights.
by Jordan Kelly 26 February 2025
Americans are in love with Karoline Leavitt, the new, 27-year-old Whitehouse Press Secretary. She is eloquent, has a razor-sharp wit and a speed-of-light response formulation time, is meticulously prepared . . . and is fiercely loyal to the boss. However . . . At this morning's press briefing she showed a crack - a potential big negative -in her otherwise impeccable and impenetrable modus operandi. The layman audience didn't pick it up; the glowing compliments continued to avalanche in. But I saw a hint of the old politician and traditional press secretary sleight of hand: When a reporter asked her about the seriousness of tonight's deadline for all Federal government staff to respond to Elon Musk's / DOGE's "send us 5 things you did last week" V2 email, she pulled out the old "reframe the question and monologue it back to something positive and be emphatic to take the emphasis off your redirection" trick. (It's between 9.47 minutes and 13.54 minutes in. Particularly note the clarity and simplicity of the second reporter's key question i.e. will Federal employees be fired if they ignore Musk's email for a second time ? Watch .) There it was . . . that tired old advice STILL given out to politicians by their media training PR consultant hacks. I've commented on this previously here . And while I think it's disingenuous to do it at all, it's wholly inadvisable to do it if you're not particularly good at it. Under the headline, ' Minister of Police vs Jack Tame ', I gave an in-action example, including with the link to the interview and the timestamp at which Mitchell embarrassed himself mightily (albeit he bulldozed on, completely oblivious). While Leavitt employed the technique (which I prefer to call a "tactic") skilfully, that skill was more of a mechanical one in her case.. Whereas, when Trump uses it (which he does frequently), he's a master at it. His charismatic natural slide into an alternative impassioned point or story is so natural. So, well . . . Trump. Trump will always get away with it. It's baked into his style. But Leavitt will only get away with it for as long as the puppy love phase lasts and her halo continues to shine so brightly. At some point, if she employs it too regularly, the average citizen out there in viewer land will realise that she's not actually answering the question. I don't think she'll ever be seen as negatively as Biden's "press secretary" (if you could call her that) Karine Jean-Pierre, of course, but Leavitt's podium is at such a currently great height that she has a long way to fall if she does. Notwithstanding her exuberant youth, captivating good looks and "don't fck with me" forceful manner, there's one thing that pisses off the press and the punters alike. And that's repeatedly not giving straight answers to straight questions. So it was a disappointment to see her pull this one out the bag so early in her tenure as hallowed Whitehouse Press Secretary - since its emergence doesn't augur well going forward. I mean, just to know that she would resort to it whenever she felt it expedient. The Observational Minutiae By way of further observation, watch carefully as the second reporter comes in with a determination to get the straight answer the first one didn't succeed in getting. At this point, if you're a keen observer of human behaviour and responses, you'll notice Leavitt is slightly pushed off her confident footing. She makes two grammatical stumbles: she first said "Elon come in" instead of "Elon came in". Then she transposed two words slightly further on. When the second reporter kept pressing her, she defensively snapped, "Are my press briefings not good enough for you, Jackie?" Not good. She doesn't like being pressed so hard. She needs to get used to it, or there'll be an increasing number of moments when she comes at least slightly unstuck behind the podium. 
by Jordan Kelly 25 February 2025
JUST IN: PRESS RELEASE FROM THE OFFICE OF REPUBLICAN SENATOR MIKE LEE OF UTAH. Calling for the United States' complete withdrawal from the UN, Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah has introduced the Disengaging Entirely from the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act ,. The DEFUND Act "addresses grave issues of national sovereignty and fiscal accountability which have plagued US. involvement in the UN". Co-sponsored in the Senate by Republican Senators Marsha Blackburn and Rick Scott, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers and Representative Chip Roy (also Republicans) the accompanying comments by Senator Lee read: "No more blank checks for the United Nations. Americans' hard-earned dollars have been funneled into initiatives that fly in the face of our values, enabling tyrants, betraying allies, and spreading bigotry "With the DEFUND Act, we're stepping away from this debacle. If we engage with the UN in the future, it will be on our terms, with the full backing of the Senate and an iron-clad escape clause." He said the UN had betrayed U.S. trust repeatedly, and that the country should not "to be their cash cow" while the UN undermines the U.S.'s own national security and interests. Meantime, Senator Blackburn said: “ The DEFUND Act will stop all forms of U.S. financial support to the UN and hold this wayward organisation accountable for placating Hamas terrorists and the Chinese Communist Party.” Meantime, Senator Chip Roy commented: “From UNRWA actively protecting Hamas and acting against our ally Israel, and delaying condemnation of Hamas, to China being elected to the 'Human Rights Council,' to the propagation of climate hysteria, covering for China's forced abortion and sterilisation programs . . . the UN's decades-old, internal rot once again raises the questions of why the United States is even still a member or why we're wasting billions every year on it."
Show More