Upston's Active Greenlighting & Fostering of Her Ministry's 'Soft Kill' Culture Needs URGENT Challenge

I spent several years of the very early part of my career as Executive Officer - Communication & Information for the New Zealand Disabled Persons Assembly (DPA).
There, I added to my "soft spot" for animals and the elderly, a real activist protectionism of people with disabilities.
Among the many and varied highlights of my time with the DPA were the publication, in hard cover, of my very first book, Public Relations for Non-Profit Organisations in New Zealand, and the memory of the day a significant group of (something around 10) MPs embarked on a day's "getting around" Wellington in wheelchairs – taking the DPA up on its challenge to Parliamentarians to experience accessibility issues in the Capital, first-hand. (I note that, in more recent times i.e. 2018, then-Disabilities Minister Carmel Sepuloni and ACC Minister Iain Lees-Galloway, tackled Parliament Buildings as wheelchair-users-for-a-day.)
It was a real eye-opener for those 10 or so Parliamentarians, and I doubt that, thereafter, any of them looked favorably upon anyone who dismissed or took lightly the challenges of those with disabilities.
Upston's Role As 'Caretaker' of the Disability Sector
Fast forward to 2025 and New Zealand has one of the cruelest, most inappropriate selections of a Disabilities Issues portfolio holder that the current Prime Minister could ever have made.
Also the Minister of "Social Development", of the Community and Voluntary Sector, and of "Childhood Poverty Reduction", Upston appears to see no difference between those encompassed by these portfolios, and her previous role as holder of the Corrections portfolio.
Supposedly appointed to "care" about the welfare and wellbeing of the most vulnerable in our society, the first thing the "honorable" Minister did when she took office was to announce her overt contempt for the sector and those comprising all components of it by slashing funding support in critical areas, and seemingly revelling in the immense distress she brought down upon those potentially impacted by whatever they feared she was scheming next.
The Hang Over of Her 'Corrections' Approach to 'Social Development' & Employment
And she wasted no time at bringing her old "Corrections" portfolio approach to bear on other vulnerable sectors of the community - like those her Government's immediate slash-and-burn measures upon entering office relegated to the employment scrap heap . . . in an overall job market they also seemed to take delight in tanking.
I might have a sharp pen, but I have a soft heart. And I watched - with dismay and disgust - the press conferences of this Caricature of Cruelty as she stood, smirkingly, a little (or a lot) too close to the new PM (who, in turn, referred to her by what is obviously his pet name for her, “Lou”), as he and home girl announced their latest scheme to make the lives of the vulnerable as difficult and as fear-based as they could . . . including (as above) those with disabilities. (In other classic optics fails - of which there have been many - she strutted contemptuously past a protesting disability support worker, and arrogantly flung open the doors of power, thrusting a look back over her shoulder that said it all: “I belong in here . . . and you and your type belong out there. Ha.”)
In every press conference in which she announces yet another punishing measure for those already suffering, she barely even tries to conceal her cruel contempt – as she bobble-headedly bounces her noggin along to the PM’s latest announcement on her behalf.
A side note to the Prime Minister:
My question to Luxon would be this:
What was your strategy behind putting the very individual that has the greatest degree of open and active contempt for those directly impacted by her portfolios, in charge of those precise portfolios? If her contempt is as obvious as it is to the general public, there's no way you can have been unaware of it. Thus, for such a wilfully inappropriate decision, in my view you’re just as culpable for the degree of additional pain that has been unnecessarily added to the weight of suffering by these sectors and the living, breathing human beings comprising them . . . and to whom you seem happily oblivious.
So All That Is Background and Context. Now to Shine A Light on A Truly Corrupt & Sinister Culture.
Recently, I published an investigative commentary on some of what really goes on in the "higher offices" of Louise Upston's Ministry of Social Development.
In my June 18 article - The Heinous Secret Practices of An Unaccountable Ministry & Its Off-the-Chain Staffers - I wrote of employees and officials of an agency so heinous and so unaccountable in its culture, that it celebrates its ability to push its "clients" (read: beneficiaries, including the disabled) to the point of - and to the execution of - suicide. Yes, SUICIDE.
And they revel in it. Behind closed doors, these moments are considered "bell-ringing" moments.
When I first began uncovering these stories, I approached a friend of mine who has acted - out of the goodness of his heart - as a long-time support person for individuals fighting for their rights against this deeply corrupt institution. I had hoped he would tell me that the young woman I'd learned they'd pushed to suicide with fake claims against her (that they shamelessly later admitted staffers had faked) . . . that it was some terrible one-off and that heads had rolled and huge lessons had been learned from this tragic loss of life.
But no. Read that article, and you'll see that what he actually told me was this:
"Jordan, it happens frequently. It's their culture. It's considered a real achievement when they've been able to push someone that far."
And you'll read how, in disbelief, I had asked him: "But why don't we see these articles in the media every time, then?
And he had answered:
"Because the Coroner doesn't allow them to be reported on."
So you see just how deep the corruption runs. And the power of this Ministry. And the clear and present danger of the portfolio overseeing it, resting in the wrong hands.
Which, I contend, is currently precisely the case.
In my earlier article, I provide a summarised list of just SOME (some) recent examples of which I'm aware, regarding the bullying (especially financial and psychological) of beneficiaries (with seemingly a particular fetish in the culture for corrupt targeting of the sick and disabled) at the hands of some of these twisted Ministry staffers - who are actively encouraged and coached to exact these highly unethical practices.
In short, this proudly (and literally) “soft kill” culture that Upston oversees (and encourages) in her "ministry" has gone too far: People are dying – literally – at the hands of the despicable, twisted individuals whose behaviour she knowingly and perversely greenlights.
And to the residents of Taupo:
Is this really the type of individual you want representing you in Parliament? As your “honorable” elected member?
I’d take a closer look at the true nature of the actual individual behind the title, if I were you. There’s got to be more human options available to you, come the next General Election. I urge you to investigate them.
You might also like to read . . .
The heinous secret practices of an unaccountable Ministry and its off-the-chain staffers.
The '5Ds': The plays and ploys New Zealand government agencies use to frustrate, stymie and roadblock you, the pesky KiwI citizens.
citizen.
Other News, Reviews & Commentary
