'WHO d'état': A Globalist Power Grab With No Political Debate
Jordan Kelly • 27 May 2024

An Entirely Under-Reported Globalist "WHO de tat": 


'The mainstream media is fascinated by relative trivia, while the big show is playing out above us at global level.'


Australia is at "a critical moment" in recognising the imperative to prevent "a globalist health power grab", according to a South Australian MP heading up a larger group of Parliamentarians attempting to shine light on a "grossly under-reported issue" of concern to all Australians.


United Nations body, the World Health Organisation - under the guise of the World Health Assembly - is proposing a brand new pandemic treaty and 300 amendments to the International Health Regulations that would give the WHO's Director General the ability to unilaterally declare a global health emergency and fast-track pandemic-related products.


In this interview with Australian Sky News host Peta Credlin, Liberal Senator Alex Antic urges Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to “pull out” of the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty.


'There Needs To Be More Politicians Across This'


“Domestic mainstream media are fascinated by matters of relative trivia while the big show is playing out above us at global levels,” Antic warned.


“This is a critical moment because what we are seeing now is effectively a globalist health power grab."


If ratified, Australia will have a legal obligation under international law, he says.


"There will be no real limit to the obligations put on the Australian Parliament to legislate. This is a VERY significant moment and there needs to be more (awareness of what’s going on). There needs to be more politicians that are across it.


"We will find we have afforded these international bureaucrats the luxury of telling us what to do, and overruling local health representatives and doctors (with lockdowns, mandates, compulsory vaccinations, 'pandemic products', whatever they want, "that's just the tip of the iceberg").


Australian Electorates Should Be Asked:  'Do You Want To Give Away Your Sovereignty?'

 

Host Peta Credlin says:  "Questions should be asked of the Australian electorates: 'Do you want to give away your sovereignty like this?'


"Unlike in the U.S. where treaties like this have to have far more political debate and input than In Australia, we sign up FAR too readily,” she says. "These are international health laws drafted by unelected international bureaucrats, all of whom are captured."


Antic agrees:

 

“These international treaties become rubber-stamp jobs. They are always passed by the Parliament.


'People Are Against This in Numbers Not Seen In A Long Time'


"And then in the event of some future emergency, people will say, 'We don’t remember giving that power away.' But by then it has become LAW. Parliamentarians will suddenly realise that they gave their own domestic powers away through what was grifted in to this Treaty.

 

“People are telling me in numbers I haven’t seen for a long time, 'We don’t want this.'


"Albanese needs to pull out NOW.”


'This Would Make Dan Andrews Look Like A Teddy Bear'


Credlin adds, with regard to "what Dan Andrews did to Victorians during COVID, with the two and a half years of lockdowns and (other draconian measures)": 


"If this becomes law, it will make Dan Andrews look like a teddy bear.”


Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 4 June 2025
Hey PowerCo: I Do NOT Appreciate You Giving Out My Email Address to Research Companies . . . Especially Those Who Treat YOUR Customers with Utter Contempt (& Spam Them)
by Jordan Kelly 3 June 2025
Why You Should Teach ALL Employees to Value Your Brand
by Jordan Kelly 26 May 2025
Ministry of Social Development Employee Sprays Around A Client's Private Information, then Sends It to A Journalist 
by Jordan Kelly 25 May 2025
Learn the Plays & Ploys of New Zealand Government Agencies to Beat Them At Their Own Sordid Game Since starting 'The Customer & The Constituent' back in January 2024, I've been learning things about the New Zealand political scene as it relates to Ministers and their Ministries (or agencies or bureaus), and also the behind-the-curtain Parliamentary machinations related to them. Things I almost wish now that I didn't know. But they're things that, for better or for worse, ALL New Zealanders should know, about the way the New Zealand Government and its "public service" really operates. If you don't know how things operate in reality (not just the PR fluff on their websites) in some of these big-name agencies that we are forced to deal with in one way or another, at some time or another, depending on the need or issue you're attempting to have solved or resolved, you could go around in ever-increasing frustrating circles for weeks, months and even years. Before getting absolutely nowhere . And the worst part is: That's the intention . The 5 D's 1) Delay 2) Defer 3) Deny 4) Defend 5) Dismissed They're largely self-explanatory, but it's an absolute playbook that they stick to, and apparently senior agency bureaucrats and Ministers and their staff are taught this as a rite of passage into parliamentary and career public "roles" . . . and then are sworn to secrecy over it, in a manner that almost has "Eyes Wide Shut" secret society overtones to it. You NEVER refer to the '5 D's' outside of the walls of inner sanctums. However, I'd add two more "D"s to their list: The sixth: Deaf (as in, Ignore). The seventh: Dumb .. And oh my goodness, let me count the ways (which I will do in further articles in this Series, in specific, detailed and named examples). So between your introduction herein to the 'D's', and my ongoing and, I hope, enlightening, series for your continuing and essential edification regarding How Wellington Really Works, I trust that you'll end up knowing how to deal with this sordid scene in a more strategic manner, for a less infuriating time, and maybe even with an outcome. Although there's no guarantee that any "outcome" won't be no outcome. Because that's almost always their intention. Oh, and I do hope that my pieces actually do become an ongoing series, because they do "hit men" (of sorts), too. Yeah, really. Paid generously (with your money, by the way) to "remove" "difficult" ( their words; not mine) individuals. Like me. Stay tuned. See you again shortly. I hope. (PS: I think a feel a book coming on.) COMING NEXT : A drill-down on each of the 'D's. And next up after that: The detailed argument I'll put to the private sector on why hiring an ex-bureaucrat is a very bad idea ( Hint: You might think it gives you in-house lobbyist power and back-door influence, but the price you'll pay is the '5D' customer service anti-culture they'll foster throughout your organisation. Even IF you keep them away from the frontline, it will happen by osmosis anyway. And faster than you think. The worst part? The longer you keep them, the more irreversible the damage they'll seed in your culture. Which then hits your brand. And so on. So, to C-suites everywhere, this will be a read you NEED .
by Jordan Kelly 25 May 2025
Thousands Sign Up to 'Better Wellington' Movement, Seeking Urgent Cessation to Unaffordable Rates, Economic Decay and 'Wrong Direction' of City Council
by Jordan Kelly 20 May 2025
To the Silly Old Placard-Waving (& Terrorist-Supporting) Fools . . . As Seen Daily On the Corner of Chapel & Perry Streets in Masterton
by Jordan Kelly 18 May 2025
** READERS: SEE UPDATE AT END OF ARTICLE. - The Ed. ** Dear MDC Management, Do You Have Any Standards for Your Call Centre Contractors?
by Jordan Kelly 15 May 2025
Being Known As the Woman Who Introduced 'C---' into the New Zealand Parliament, Wasn't A Smart Long-Term Strategy
by Jordan Kelly 14 May 2025
Cheap Trumps Standards, Ethics & Compassion . . . Apparently
by Jordan Kelly 13 May 2025
A Massive Upside IF It's Done Right . . . and An Unrecoverable Downside It It's Not
Show More