Ministerial Radio Silence: When Is It Negligence of Duty?
Jordan Kelly • 23 May 2024

Ministry of Social Development's Toxic, Antagonising Culture Pervades Minister's Own Office, It Appears:  Talk About Leading By Example . . .

Following through on an absolutely heinous situation I have reported on here on this platform, I would publicly ask the Minister of Social Development, Louise Upston, why - after yet a further month - she has doggedly chosen not to address, or even acknowledge, the dishonest, vindictive and economically crippling behaviour of the Ministry personnel (towards a disabled individual).


Likewise, on behalf of the individual that has been - and continues to be - grossly mistreated, wronged and cut off from all legal entitlements (and is at risk of homelessness, as a result), I would also hereby ask why the matter has received no recognition, no acknowledgement of any kind, and most certainly no action?


I'll refrain from repeating any more of the already ample detail provided in the article in question, because Upston's office has long since - and repeatedly - been provided with ample evidence, including an evidential, Justice of the Peace-witnessed, 40-page correspondence dossier.


But still she and/or her personnel refuse not only to address the (multi-faceted) issue but even to do so much as send a one-sentence email of acknowledgement of receipt of any of the multiple-times-supplied communications.


Clearly, the personal vendetta being visited upon the individual in question is considered perfectly fine with the Minister . . . as is a culture - including, obviously, in her own office - whereby the situation is being actively and intentionally aggravated by the continued ignoring of any of the communications surrounding the issue. And that's despite it now being the subject of a Human Rights Commission case.


Astounding, Childish & Should Be Above A 'Minister of the Crown'


Astounding. Childish. And clearly intended as further outright contempt for the individual in question.


And it should be above the mentality of a Minister of the Crown.


But here's how bad the conduct of the Minister and her associated personnel actually is:


She's had to be prompted by two other senior Ministers and several MPs, and the Prime Minister's office (twice) . . . each of whom have acknowledged my own drawing of their attention to the matter through the article on The Customer & The Constituent. And those are just the courteous, professional and concerned representatives who have responded to my drawing their attention to my article and the matter, by corresponding back to me that they've prompted Upston's office to respond.


But here's the kicker: For all that, she and her childishly antagonistic office and the fat-salaried spin doctor officials in her toxic culture Ministry - even so - still haven't acknowledged anyone about anything.


Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 4 June 2025
Hey PowerCo: I Do NOT Appreciate You Giving Out My Email Address to Research Companies . . . Especially Those Who Treat YOUR Customers with Utter Contempt (& Spam Them)
by Jordan Kelly 3 June 2025
Why You Should Teach ALL Employees to Value Your Brand
by Jordan Kelly 26 May 2025
Ministry of Social Development Employee Sprays Around A Client's Private Information, then Sends It to A Journalist 
by Jordan Kelly 25 May 2025
Learn the Plays & Ploys of New Zealand Government Agencies to Beat Them At Their Own Sordid Game Since starting 'The Customer & The Constituent' back in January 2024, I've been learning things about the New Zealand political scene as it relates to Ministers and their Ministries (or agencies or bureaus), and also the behind-the-curtain Parliamentary machinations related to them. Things I almost wish now that I didn't know. But they're things that, for better or for worse, ALL New Zealanders should know, about the way the New Zealand Government and its "public service" really operates. If you don't know how things operate in reality (not just the PR fluff on their websites) in some of these big-name agencies that we are forced to deal with in one way or another, at some time or another, depending on the need or issue you're attempting to have solved or resolved, you could go around in ever-increasing frustrating circles for weeks, months and even years. Before getting absolutely nowhere . And the worst part is: That's the intention . The 5 D's 1) Delay 2) Defer 3) Deny 4) Defend 5) Dismissed They're largely self-explanatory, but it's an absolute playbook that they stick to, and apparently senior agency bureaucrats and Ministers and their staff are taught this as a rite of passage into parliamentary and career public "roles" . . . and then are sworn to secrecy over it, in a manner that almost has "Eyes Wide Shut" secret society overtones to it. You NEVER refer to the '5 D's' outside of the walls of inner sanctums. However, I'd add two more "D"s to their list: The sixth: Deaf (as in, Ignore). The seventh: Dumb .. And oh my goodness, let me count the ways (which I will do in further articles in this Series, in specific, detailed and named examples). So between your introduction herein to the 'D's', and my ongoing and, I hope, enlightening, series for your continuing and essential edification regarding How Wellington Really Works, I trust that you'll end up knowing how to deal with this sordid scene in a more strategic manner, for a less infuriating time, and maybe even with an outcome. Although there's no guarantee that any "outcome" won't be no outcome. Because that's almost always their intention. Oh, and I do hope that my pieces actually do become an ongoing series, because they do "hit men" (of sorts), too. Yeah, really. Paid generously (with your money, by the way) to "remove" "difficult" ( their words; not mine) individuals. Like me. Stay tuned. See you again shortly. I hope. (PS: I think a feel a book coming on.) COMING NEXT : A drill-down on each of the 'D's. And next up after that: The detailed argument I'll put to the private sector on why hiring an ex-bureaucrat is a very bad idea ( Hint: You might think it gives you in-house lobbyist power and back-door influence, but the price you'll pay is the '5D' customer service anti-culture they'll foster throughout your organisation. Even IF you keep them away from the frontline, it will happen by osmosis anyway. And faster than you think. The worst part? The longer you keep them, the more irreversible the damage they'll seed in your culture. Which then hits your brand. And so on. So, to C-suites everywhere, this will be a read you NEED .
by Jordan Kelly 25 May 2025
Thousands Sign Up to 'Better Wellington' Movement, Seeking Urgent Cessation to Unaffordable Rates, Economic Decay and 'Wrong Direction' of City Council
by Jordan Kelly 20 May 2025
To the Silly Old Placard-Waving (& Terrorist-Supporting) Fools . . . As Seen Daily On the Corner of Chapel & Perry Streets in Masterton
by Jordan Kelly 18 May 2025
** READERS: SEE UPDATE AT END OF ARTICLE. - The Ed. ** Dear MDC Management, Do You Have Any Standards for Your Call Centre Contractors?
by Jordan Kelly 15 May 2025
Being Known As the Woman Who Introduced 'C---' into the New Zealand Parliament, Wasn't A Smart Long-Term Strategy
by Jordan Kelly 14 May 2025
Cheap Trumps Standards, Ethics & Compassion . . . Apparently
by Jordan Kelly 13 May 2025
A Massive Upside IF It's Done Right . . . and An Unrecoverable Downside It It's Not
Show More