So . . . the Covid Inquiry Commission Wants to Know How to Win Back the Public's Trust.

Well, let me see. You could:

1)  Acknowledge the obvious link between "excess deaths" and the Covid "vaccine" . . . a link that (genuine) scientific studies and (genuine and appropriately qualified) medical experts are now revealing in such an avalanche of evidence that even the uber-aggressive censorship of mainstream media and online platforms can't keep these realities from the general public any longer.

2)  Acknowledge, and focus your efforts on creating a compensation scheme to provide for the many vaccine-injured New Zealanders, including, and perhaps most especially, those who were ridiculed, persecuted or otherwise denied validation, mistreated or ignored by the medical "profession" (you know, those whose first and most sacred obligation is to "Do No Harm").

3)  Cease denial of the enduring societal divide (including within family units) that was willfully created by political "leaders".

4)  Not only recognise but find ways to redress, at least to some degree, the massive economic harm created to small and medium-sized businesses throughout the country, and from which many (i.e. the ones that survived) are still struggling to recover.

There's a lot more, of course. But those are some good, basic starting points.

We Want More Than Just Your 'PR' to Dull Our Memories

That would be of far greater value to the populace than your simply working out how to "win back trust". What? So that you can dull the public's memory for when the next opportunity comes around for your "institutions" to pull off the same, or a different, type of tyranny upon our society?

And now, to those who would dodge the bullet of our ire by hanging the whole sorry mess on the past governing party. Thus (you think), both effectively positioning these horrific crimes firmly in the past, by framing them as the previous government's decision-making and doing:

That doesn't wash. ALL parties, and ALL members thereof, gave the entire malarkey their firm and enthusiastic green light. (Although some, perhaps only by the complicity of their silence and co-operation.)

Here's one National Party pundit's repeated attempt at pointing the bone at "the other bloke" (see below YouTube video):  (But wasn't it, for example, the Leader of the then-Opposition, Christopher Luxon, who - again, by way of example - wanted to force all beneficiaries to take the toxic, syringe-delivered shite into their veins, whether or not they wanted it, or have their benefits cut off? Wasn't that the type of full-scale, no-one-escapes-this-net, uber-authoritarian approach he preferred? And wasn't there only ONE politician who fronted the mandates protestors, when thousands of them gathered in the grounds of Parliament?)

And there's another whole dimension to the ongoing impacts of this atrocity; these crimes against humanity:

Regarding the slew of COVID-related hospital killings that went on in the United States and the United Kingdom (and almost certainly, more broadly) . . . Will we ever find out to what degree that sort of underhand atrocity might have also been perpetrated upon Kiwis by New Zealand hospitals?

By way of example: https://rumble.com/v55bhet-virtua-hospital-torture-and-murder-part-2.html



As more and more revelations emerge from the darkness of this awful era, let's hope we get to the bottom of the role that sector played (beyond the "heroism" we were all meant to revere it for).