Seniors’ Struggles & the Shame of Their Invisibility in New Zealand Today
Jordan Kelly • 20 August 2024

Opposition Spokesperson for Seniors, Ingrid Leary, On Our Elderly Sector's Untenable Slide into Shame and Poverty . . . & Why We Must Arrest It URGENTLY

New Zealand, we have a problem . . . a problem that has crept up on us slowly but, unfortunately, steadily. It's a problem that, at both a broader societal and governmental level, we have paid grossly insufficient attention to.


But now it’s upon us like an oncoming freight train.


That problem is the entry into “senior-dom” of the huge Baby Boomer generation; a “bulge” in western society’s demographics that has created major demands, opportunities, challenges and changes as its front end has entered into each next new stage of its life cycle (followed ultimately by its back end).


With the Boomer bulge’s front end now well up in the senior sector age bracket, and its tail end crossing over the 60-plus point and also heading for retirement, the issues that have challenged that broad demographic for decades are intensifying to an unprecedented degree. And that natural intensification is being further helped along (in the most negative sense) by recent and continuing cost-inflationary trends.


The matter should now be concerning ALL of us.  Taking even a quick glance at the baldest of statistics, we can see said “approaching freight train” factor: According to the 2018 census results, there were 819,600 people aged 65 years and over in New Zealand. By 2034 it is estimated there will be 1.2 million.


My recent interview with Grey Power’s new National President (“Do we pay the rates, heat a room, or have a proper meal this week?”), outlined the severity and the shameful deprivation in which many Kiwi seniors are now living.


And that, pitifully, includes those who are living in that state of deprivation alone and forgotten by society at large.


‘Inclusion’ Has A Genuine Meaning in this Parliamentarian’s Vocabulary


While the term “inclusion” has, in recent years, descended into the absurd terrain of wokeness, there’s one New Zealand Parliamentarian for whom the concept has retained both its original meaning and its intended seriousness.


That politician is Opposition Spokesperson for Seniors (and also for Mental Health), Taieri MP Ingrid Leary. And she’s not about to sit by and watch the above picture remain continually unaddressed and getting worse.


The multitude of challenges comprising the overall portfolio is almost without limit:


From the level of government benefit (or “pension” as it was once called) being insufficient to afford even decent quality food, to the increasing proportion of the sector that no longer owns their own home and is forced to join rental queues (often living in substandard digs, with some elderly folk actually “couch-surfing”), to cruel, financially-forced social isolation . . . and everything in between, Leary is going to need every ounce of her own personal and professional passion to make the dent she is intent on making.


And she’s going to have to make that dent against the odds she faces viz a viz the fact that she’s “only” the Opposition Spokesperson.


Addressing the Invisibility of Seniors Issues:  A Series of Special Features Focused On Shining A Light On the Shame & Identifying the Solutions


In what will be a regular roll-out of Special Features over the next few months, I will be interviewing Leary on the many issues and challenges she sees as the key priorities.


We’ll be covering the magnified impact of the cost-of-living crisis on seniors, homelessness and the elderly, the age-related digital divide, aged care, elder abuse, hospice care, death without debt . . . and more.


The intention of this Series will be to alert Leary’s fellow Parliamentarians to the growing severity of these issues, and how – in many cases – they intersect with their own portfolios and areas of responsibility.


When Passion, Politician & Portfolio Collide


So, what sort of a politician feels such a degree of passion for such a challenging portfolio, and what drives her?


Ingrid Leary’s professional background is an impressive pot pourri of achievements and high-profile positions in the fields of law, journalism, and international relations and development . . . within, particularly, the geographic domains of East Asia and the Pacific.


Thus, while her drive seems to be of the intensity that can only come from a personal mission, it’s actually the various elements of her professional experience that come together to lay the ground for a very practical view of the issues.


A Brand of Passion that Breeds Pragmatism


In fact, her approach and her objectives are intensely pragmatic:


“I am absolutely passionate about policies that mean everybody is valued and that everybody can contribute to our national community, whatever that means within any given set of circumstances,” she says.


“Including everybody as a citizen of equal value, and equal potential, no matter their age, is the most reasonable and rational way for a society to operate if it wants to be efficient.


“If everybody is empowered to contribute optimally in a genuinely inclusive country, this breeds a healthy society in multiple regards.


“There’s a wealth of evidence to point to. We have teenagers going off the rails because parents are too time-poor to provide the care and stabilising influence a young person needs at critical times in their life, just by way of a single example.


"And there are many, many smart and capable retirees who could, and wish to, contribute to society, but they can’t, simply because their primary priority every day is sheer survival . . . back to the 'Do I eat, heat a room, or pay the rent or rates today?' dilemma.


“It’s a huge societal disconnect,” she says, drawing on her observations of better-functioning alternative structures, from her journalistic, and economic and community development, postings in the Pacific.


“Many of these issues have their roots in the way we are structured as a society. So much of it just doesn’t work.”


The Most Forgotten of the Forgotten


Leary is the Member of Parliament for Taieri – one of the poorest, and “oldest” regions of New Zealand, demographically speaking. The electorate includes South Dunedin and stretches south of Balclutha down to Kaka Point and westward to Middlemarch.


While many seniors opt to live in South Dunedin because its flat topography reduces accessibility challenges, it is - regardless - traditionally a poor area.


“The reason I asked for this portfolio is because my electorate has one of the most aged populations in New Zealand,” Leary said. “Around 25 percent of Taieri’s populace is over the age of 60, and many are disabled. The average annual income across the entire electorate is $26,000, which makes it one of the most economically deprived areas in the country.”


Giving Voice to the Voiceless


The common theme throughout Leary’s impressive pre-politics career, with its many international postings as well as her earlier pro bono legal work, has been giving a voice to the voiceless in society. And the time has well come to bring that experience and those insights to bear with regard to the alarming problems now facing Kiwi seniors.


Her desire to make a genuine change is intensified by her family’s multi-generational Otago background. Various historic Queenstown and South Dunedin cemeteries contain the “old bones” of her ancestors who, by way of example, on her father's side, immigrated from Ireland and worked tough lives in the 1800s Glenorchy gold mines.


Her Dutch mother, too, was no stranger to a tough upbringing before her own arrival on New Zealand shores, having survived the Nazi holocaust and an early life navigating bomb shelters, followed by life-threatening tuberculosis which, in turn, saw her shipped off and separated thereafter from her family.


WATCH FOR THE NEXT INSTALMENT, IN WHICH LEARY PULLS BACK THE CURTAIN ON HOMELESSNESS AND THE ELDERLY . . . AN INCREASING & HORRIFYING TREND.

Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 21 April 2025
AI & Robotics Expert Provides Commentary on Skinny's New 'Brand Ambassador'
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
Err . . . No Conflict of Interest Here, At All?
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
You Know It's Bad When Even Mainstream Medical Journals Are Forced to Report On It
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
More on the BUPA international chain of houses-of-horror . . .
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I've Been Tracking Abuse-in-Aged-Care-Facilities for A While Now . . . and Something HAS to Be Done About this Almighty Horror Show
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I'm SO Glad I Manage to Survive Without A Cell Phone . . .
by Jordan Kelly 5 March 2025
Breathing in Foul-Smelling Emissions from Over the Fence? House Filling up with Toxic Fumes? Getting Your Washing Smoked Out? Here Are Your Rights.
by Jordan Kelly 26 February 2025
Americans are in love with Karoline Leavitt, the new, 27-year-old Whitehouse Press Secretary. She is eloquent, has a razor-sharp wit and a speed-of-light response formulation time, is meticulously prepared . . . and is fiercely loyal to the boss. However . . . At this morning's press briefing she showed a crack - a potential big negative -in her otherwise impeccable and impenetrable modus operandi. The layman audience didn't pick it up; the glowing compliments continued to avalanche in. But I saw a hint of the old politician and traditional press secretary sleight of hand: When a reporter asked her about the seriousness of tonight's deadline for all Federal government staff to respond to Elon Musk's / DOGE's "send us 5 things you did last week" V2 email, she pulled out the old "reframe the question and monologue it back to something positive and be emphatic to take the emphasis off your redirection" trick. (It's between 9.47 minutes and 13.54 minutes in. Particularly note the clarity and simplicity of the second reporter's key question i.e. will Federal employees be fired if they ignore Musk's email for a second time ? Watch .) There it was . . . that tired old advice STILL given out to politicians by their media training PR consultant hacks. I've commented on this previously here . And while I think it's disingenuous to do it at all, it's wholly inadvisable to do it if you're not particularly good at it. Under the headline, ' Minister of Police vs Jack Tame ', I gave an in-action example, including with the link to the interview and the timestamp at which Mitchell embarrassed himself mightily (albeit he bulldozed on, completely oblivious). While Leavitt employed the technique (which I prefer to call a "tactic") skilfully, that skill was more of a mechanical one in her case.. Whereas, when Trump uses it (which he does frequently), he's a master at it. His charismatic natural slide into an alternative impassioned point or story is so natural. So, well . . . Trump. Trump will always get away with it. It's baked into his style. But Leavitt will only get away with it for as long as the puppy love phase lasts and her halo continues to shine so brightly. At some point, if she employs it too regularly, the average citizen out there in viewer land will realise that she's not actually answering the question. I don't think she'll ever be seen as negatively as Biden's "press secretary" (if you could call her that) Karine Jean-Pierre, of course, but Leavitt's podium is at such a currently great height that she has a long way to fall if she does. Notwithstanding her exuberant youth, captivating good looks and "don't fck with me" forceful manner, there's one thing that pisses off the press and the punters alike. And that's repeatedly not giving straight answers to straight questions. So it was a disappointment to see her pull this one out the bag so early in her tenure as hallowed Whitehouse Press Secretary - since its emergence doesn't augur well going forward. I mean, just to know that she would resort to it whenever she felt it expedient. The Observational Minutiae By way of further observation, watch carefully as the second reporter comes in with a determination to get the straight answer the first one didn't succeed in getting. At this point, if you're a keen observer of human behaviour and responses, you'll notice Leavitt is slightly pushed off her confident footing. She makes two grammatical stumbles: she first said "Elon come in" instead of "Elon came in". Then she transposed two words slightly further on. When the second reporter kept pressing her, she defensively snapped, "Are my press briefings not good enough for you, Jackie?" Not good. She doesn't like being pressed so hard. She needs to get used to it, or there'll be an increasing number of moments when she comes at least slightly unstuck behind the podium. 
by Jordan Kelly 25 February 2025
JUST IN: PRESS RELEASE FROM THE OFFICE OF REPUBLICAN SENATOR MIKE LEE OF UTAH. Calling for the United States' complete withdrawal from the UN, Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah has introduced the Disengaging Entirely from the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act ,. The DEFUND Act "addresses grave issues of national sovereignty and fiscal accountability which have plagued US. involvement in the UN". Co-sponsored in the Senate by Republican Senators Marsha Blackburn and Rick Scott, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers and Representative Chip Roy (also Republicans) the accompanying comments by Senator Lee read: "No more blank checks for the United Nations. Americans' hard-earned dollars have been funneled into initiatives that fly in the face of our values, enabling tyrants, betraying allies, and spreading bigotry "With the DEFUND Act, we're stepping away from this debacle. If we engage with the UN in the future, it will be on our terms, with the full backing of the Senate and an iron-clad escape clause." He said the UN had betrayed U.S. trust repeatedly, and that the country should not "to be their cash cow" while the UN undermines the U.S.'s own national security and interests. Meantime, Senator Blackburn said: “ The DEFUND Act will stop all forms of U.S. financial support to the UN and hold this wayward organisation accountable for placating Hamas terrorists and the Chinese Communist Party.” Meantime, Senator Chip Roy commented: “From UNRWA actively protecting Hamas and acting against our ally Israel, and delaying condemnation of Hamas, to China being elected to the 'Human Rights Council,' to the propagation of climate hysteria, covering for China's forced abortion and sterilisation programs . . . the UN's decades-old, internal rot once again raises the questions of why the United States is even still a member or why we're wasting billions every year on it."
Show More