Did National Deliver the Ultimate Death Blow to the Wellington We Once Knew and Loved?
Jordan Kelly • 24 August 2024

For Any Reality-Divorced Elected 'Representative' Who Wants to Understand Today's 'Wellington' from the Perspective of the Average Millennial, Here's A Conversation Worth Hearing . . .

While I'm no fan of the bloated and often less-than-useless, tax-gobbling public "service" sector (so inaptly named), one visit to Wellington's CBD in recent months would leave you in no uncertain frame of mind about the loss of vibe and vibrancy of our beloved (or formerly beloved) capital.


It would seem that while the previous government certainly set Wellington up for a Great. Big. Fall., the current government's axe-wielding has dealt the death blow.


But don't take MY opinion for it:


Notwithstanding that the host of this YouTube commentary on the world's supposedly "coolest little capital" is now a consultant to those wanting to explore opportunities in developing countries, the fact that he (an American) lived here for three years (obtaining his Resident's Visa, with a view to it being his "forever home") and chats at length with a disenchanted mate he left behind (a born-and-bred Wellingtonian Gen Y), makes this an insight-rich watch.


And I heartily encourage all current Parliamentarians to do so. (Although if you're of the delicate-eared variety that, for example, dives for the remote when watching a show in which an actor drops the F-bomb a few times, maybe you'll find it a bit raw. But you'll sacrifice a serious street-level education, if you don't watch it until the end.)


Here are some of the "highlights" arising in discussion between the two Millennials:


  • While Wellington makes it into numerous lists (e.g. "the best place in the world to live"), young renters (and probably all renters!) are "sick and tired of living in cold, uninsulated places that we have to share and pay 'stupid amounts of money' for", owned by landlords with equally stupid amounts of rights, who (I'm only very mildly paraphrasing here) can do invasive quarterly inspections, and "you've still got to pay this fucking ding dong even if he never fucking fixes anything". ("There's a tribunal system that protects the tenant but that takes time, and you're paying this slumlord all the while you're going through all that.")


  • "If you're just a regular person, you can JUST keep your head above water, but it's getting harder and harder." The pair discuss the horrendous price of apartments and how it forces most Millennials to "cram into big houses with lots of flatmates". So too bad for anyone who's a bit more of an introvert; the most they'd ever be able to afford is a small studio; a property apartment with its own facilities would be out of the question.


  • The American struggles with the "logic" of why such a dramatic housing crisis exists in a country "that hardly has any fucking people. There's no shortage of space! It's not like it's Manhattan Island . . . . you go a little bit north of Wellington and there's nothing but land, you know?"


  • Neither the remaining local nor the abandoning American understand the justification for the current "massive explosion of immigrants, mostly from India, Asia and Africa, in a country that already has a housing crisis.  Unless you don't want the housing crisis to stop and you just want to lower the standard of living, as seems to be the intention in most Western countries . . . turning them all into the likes of Brazil. They don't respect the concept of the nation state; they seem to just want labour from all over the world competing and at the same low level. You can see it in these countries; regardless of who's in office, living standards just continue to decrease."


  • The local:  "New Zealand, and especially Wellington, IS actually a place where you CAN make good money, but in amongst those in that 'gentrified' strata, you have the majority of the populace, who are working class and increasingly, struggling."


  • The public services (e.g. health care) aren't reflective of the high taxes imposed upon the population. "They're not third-world, but regardless, the standard of public services has been declining steadily. All services are a lot less efficient. Every second bus won't show up. You'll be waiting longer and longer to see a doctor. On and on."


  • The born-and-bred and still-here Wellingtonian says:  "Take the scene in Courtenay Place. It's BAD now. It used to have such a vibrant night life. Sure, there was chaos, but there was a carnival atmosphere, and businesses were pumping. Now the business is dead, man. People used to be spilling out all over the streets; now there's about a third as many people out and about. And it's all just little 18-year-olds. I don't know why you'd want to own a bar in Wellington now. It's like a ghost town."


  • (Same commentator as above):  "There's a lot of homelessness here now; 'anti-social areas' of the city. Lots of drugs. It's really declined. It's a fucking hole, Bro."


  • The American in response:  "So since I left, you're saying it's turned into, like a Seattle or a San Francisco? One of those really Liberal cities that have just turned into dumps and shit-holes?"


  • (The Wellington local):  "It's exactly like that. We have these small minorities of people on six-figure salaries and doing really well, and then we've got all these homeless people that just can't keep up with the inflation and all the degeneracy that comes with that, so it really IS like the San Fran and Seattle of today."


  • With regard to the Parliament protests over the COVID-19 mandates, says the Wellingtonian:


"People were just sick of having their freedoms stripped away and they weren't going to put up with it. I saw a poll that said one-third of New Zealanders supported the protests. I think that's pretty accurate. My parents are normies and so they didn't support them, but the protestors were being reported as "fringe" . . . but one-third of the population is a pretty sizeable 'minority'."


  • Observes the formerly Wellington-based American now living in South East Asia: 


"People in Western countries are more easily manipulated than in the likes of South East Asia. People here (in South East Asia) live in an objective reality, because there's not the sophisticated media propaganda and think tanks trying to manipulate their perceptions. I've found that in these Western countries now, like the United States and New Zealand, these governments have just become more and more involved in people's lives. To have the government dictating what kind of medicine you need to put in your body or put in your children's body? That's CRAZY."


Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 21 April 2025
AI & Robotics Expert Provides Commentary on Skinny's New 'Brand Ambassador'
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
Err . . . No Conflict of Interest Here, At All?
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
You Know It's Bad When Even Mainstream Medical Journals Are Forced to Report On It
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
More on the BUPA international chain of houses-of-horror . . .
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I've Been Tracking Abuse-in-Aged-Care-Facilities for A While Now . . . and Something HAS to Be Done About this Almighty Horror Show
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I'm SO Glad I Manage to Survive Without A Cell Phone . . .
by Jordan Kelly 5 March 2025
Breathing in Foul-Smelling Emissions from Over the Fence? House Filling up with Toxic Fumes? Getting Your Washing Smoked Out? Here Are Your Rights.
by Jordan Kelly 26 February 2025
Americans are in love with Karoline Leavitt, the new, 27-year-old Whitehouse Press Secretary. She is eloquent, has a razor-sharp wit and a speed-of-light response formulation time, is meticulously prepared . . . and is fiercely loyal to the boss. However . . . At this morning's press briefing she showed a crack - a potential big negative -in her otherwise impeccable and impenetrable modus operandi. The layman audience didn't pick it up; the glowing compliments continued to avalanche in. But I saw a hint of the old politician and traditional press secretary sleight of hand: When a reporter asked her about the seriousness of tonight's deadline for all Federal government staff to respond to Elon Musk's / DOGE's "send us 5 things you did last week" V2 email, she pulled out the old "reframe the question and monologue it back to something positive and be emphatic to take the emphasis off your redirection" trick. (It's between 9.47 minutes and 13.54 minutes in. Particularly note the clarity and simplicity of the second reporter's key question i.e. will Federal employees be fired if they ignore Musk's email for a second time ? Watch .) There it was . . . that tired old advice STILL given out to politicians by their media training PR consultant hacks. I've commented on this previously here . And while I think it's disingenuous to do it at all, it's wholly inadvisable to do it if you're not particularly good at it. Under the headline, ' Minister of Police vs Jack Tame ', I gave an in-action example, including with the link to the interview and the timestamp at which Mitchell embarrassed himself mightily (albeit he bulldozed on, completely oblivious). While Leavitt employed the technique (which I prefer to call a "tactic") skilfully, that skill was more of a mechanical one in her case.. Whereas, when Trump uses it (which he does frequently), he's a master at it. His charismatic natural slide into an alternative impassioned point or story is so natural. So, well . . . Trump. Trump will always get away with it. It's baked into his style. But Leavitt will only get away with it for as long as the puppy love phase lasts and her halo continues to shine so brightly. At some point, if she employs it too regularly, the average citizen out there in viewer land will realise that she's not actually answering the question. I don't think she'll ever be seen as negatively as Biden's "press secretary" (if you could call her that) Karine Jean-Pierre, of course, but Leavitt's podium is at such a currently great height that she has a long way to fall if she does. Notwithstanding her exuberant youth, captivating good looks and "don't fck with me" forceful manner, there's one thing that pisses off the press and the punters alike. And that's repeatedly not giving straight answers to straight questions. So it was a disappointment to see her pull this one out the bag so early in her tenure as hallowed Whitehouse Press Secretary - since its emergence doesn't augur well going forward. I mean, just to know that she would resort to it whenever she felt it expedient. The Observational Minutiae By way of further observation, watch carefully as the second reporter comes in with a determination to get the straight answer the first one didn't succeed in getting. At this point, if you're a keen observer of human behaviour and responses, you'll notice Leavitt is slightly pushed off her confident footing. She makes two grammatical stumbles: she first said "Elon come in" instead of "Elon came in". Then she transposed two words slightly further on. When the second reporter kept pressing her, she defensively snapped, "Are my press briefings not good enough for you, Jackie?" Not good. She doesn't like being pressed so hard. She needs to get used to it, or there'll be an increasing number of moments when she comes at least slightly unstuck behind the podium. 
by Jordan Kelly 25 February 2025
JUST IN: PRESS RELEASE FROM THE OFFICE OF REPUBLICAN SENATOR MIKE LEE OF UTAH. Calling for the United States' complete withdrawal from the UN, Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah has introduced the Disengaging Entirely from the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act ,. The DEFUND Act "addresses grave issues of national sovereignty and fiscal accountability which have plagued US. involvement in the UN". Co-sponsored in the Senate by Republican Senators Marsha Blackburn and Rick Scott, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers and Representative Chip Roy (also Republicans) the accompanying comments by Senator Lee read: "No more blank checks for the United Nations. Americans' hard-earned dollars have been funneled into initiatives that fly in the face of our values, enabling tyrants, betraying allies, and spreading bigotry "With the DEFUND Act, we're stepping away from this debacle. If we engage with the UN in the future, it will be on our terms, with the full backing of the Senate and an iron-clad escape clause." He said the UN had betrayed U.S. trust repeatedly, and that the country should not "to be their cash cow" while the UN undermines the U.S.'s own national security and interests. Meantime, Senator Blackburn said: “ The DEFUND Act will stop all forms of U.S. financial support to the UN and hold this wayward organisation accountable for placating Hamas terrorists and the Chinese Communist Party.” Meantime, Senator Chip Roy commented: “From UNRWA actively protecting Hamas and acting against our ally Israel, and delaying condemnation of Hamas, to China being elected to the 'Human Rights Council,' to the propagation of climate hysteria, covering for China's forced abortion and sterilisation programs . . . the UN's decades-old, internal rot once again raises the questions of why the United States is even still a member or why we're wasting billions every year on it."
Show More