Not "Fit-for-Purpose" But No Refund, Either
Jordan Kelly • 10 February 2024

Don't Know. Don't Care.

Don't buy this piece of s--t.


Or, if you are tempted to buy it (but wait until I tell you why you shouldn't), then at least buy it from an outlet that is ethically-principled and will take it back if it doesn't do for you, what you bought it to do for you.


So, I bought this piece of expensive (non-functional for me) equipment about six weeks ago, for the outrageous price (for a piece of foam) of somewhere around $64.


Immediately after buying it, I actually found my standard foam collar (that had cost me under $20) and put this new one to one side for some future use. That day came a few days ago, and I put it on for the first time.


The bloody thing damn near choked me within the first few minutes I had it on. I had to rip it off quick-smart.


See that piece of fabric that's attached to the foam and wraps around it at the front (see my photo)? That thing is way harder and stiffer than it looks. It also doesn't seem to be removable. And it presses hard up against the Adam's apple (or the female version thereof), creating the sensation of something being jammed between your windpipe and the collar.


There might be other neck owners that don't experience the same level of extreme discomfort with this product, but it certainly is not fit-for-purpose as far as my own neck is concerned.


So, I took it back to its place of purchase:  Unichem in Masterton.


Now, I go into this store as little as possible. With a few exceptions (and one notable one), I find the service unfriendly, not particularly knowledgeable, and I just don't like the place. At all, for myriad reasons.


When I went in today to buy another couple of items and, at the same time, return this thing, I faced the first hurdle:  Won't even consider it without your receipt.


'Would You Actually Refund Me, If I DO That?'


Anticipating what I strongly suspected would be the ultimate outcome, I asked this question:


"If I rummage through my last six weeks' shoebox worth of receipts and find it and come back in with it, will you actually refund me, anyway?"


To which the disregarding reply was:  "You will need to come back in with your receipt, and we will go from there."


To which my reply was:  "Would you please confirm whether or not you will refund me if I spend the time finding the receipt?"


With an impatient look, the staff member disappeared out the back.


She came back:  "No."


Me:  "But I can't wear it. It chokes me. It's not fit-for-purpose."


She:  "It's got a mark on the inside of the neck bit. We can't send it back to the manufacturer."


My point precisely, Ma'am. That's how hard the bloody thing presses against my windpipe - and I only had it on for a few minutes!


She:  "Sorry. We're not taking it back."


Now, what's wrong with that is just about everything, from both an ethical and from a customer service point of view.


Let me count the ways:


1)  If it's not "fit for purpose", it's not fit for purpose. And if it's not fit for my purpose, it's not fit for purpose. And New Zealand consumer law requires it to be.


2)  If a customer reports to a retailer that a product isn't fit-for-purpose, you shouldn't just be sending it back to the manufacturer for a refund, you should be feeding back to the manufacturer the customer's experience with their product. Or, at least, if you have anything other than monetary concern, you should be.


3)  So you were going to send me away to hunt down a receipt that I told you would take me a lot of hassle to locate, and you were never going to refund me anyway? That's twisted.


4)  Brand reputation. Do I need to elaborate?


5)  Customer LTV (Life-Time Value).  I'll cover this in more detail in other articles as time goes on, but the bottom line is this:  OK, so let's say you enjoy either the satisfaction, or the avoidance of associated effort, and don't refund me. The $64 you saved in doing so, is absolutely dwarfed by the sales you're going to miss out on from me over the years i.e. my LTV to this outlet. Because, now I will be even LESS pre-disposed to spend my money with you.


Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 4 June 2025
Hey PowerCo: I Do NOT Appreciate You Giving Out My Email Address to Research Companies . . . Especially Those Who Treat YOUR Customers with Utter Contempt (& Spam Them)
by Jordan Kelly 3 June 2025
Why You Should Teach ALL Employees to Value Your Brand
by Jordan Kelly 26 May 2025
Ministry of Social Development Employee Sprays Around A Client's Private Information, then Sends It to A Journalist 
by Jordan Kelly 25 May 2025
Learn the Plays & Ploys of New Zealand Government Agencies to Beat Them At Their Own Sordid Game Since starting 'The Customer & The Constituent' back in January 2024, I've been learning things about the New Zealand political scene as it relates to Ministers and their Ministries (or agencies or bureaus), and also the behind-the-curtain Parliamentary machinations related to them. Things I almost wish now that I didn't know. But they're things that, for better or for worse, ALL New Zealanders should know, about the way the New Zealand Government and its "public service" really operates. If you don't know how things operate in reality (not just the PR fluff on their websites) in some of these big-name agencies that we are forced to deal with in one way or another, at some time or another, depending on the need or issue you're attempting to have solved or resolved, you could go around in ever-increasing frustrating circles for weeks, months and even years. Before getting absolutely nowhere . And the worst part is: That's the intention . The 5 D's 1) Delay 2) Defer 3) Deny 4) Defend 5) Dismissed They're largely self-explanatory, but it's an absolute playbook that they stick to, and apparently senior agency bureaucrats and Ministers and their staff are taught this as a rite of passage into parliamentary and career public "roles" . . . and then are sworn to secrecy over it, in a manner that almost has "Eyes Wide Shut" secret society overtones to it. You NEVER refer to the '5 D's' outside of the walls of inner sanctums. However, I'd add two more "D"s to their list: The sixth: Deaf (as in, Ignore). The seventh: Dumb .. And oh my goodness, let me count the ways (which I will do in further articles in this Series, in specific, detailed and named examples). So between your introduction herein to the 'D's', and my ongoing and, I hope, enlightening, series for your continuing and essential edification regarding How Wellington Really Works, I trust that you'll end up knowing how to deal with this sordid scene in a more strategic manner, for a less infuriating time, and maybe even with an outcome. Although there's no guarantee that any "outcome" won't be no outcome. Because that's almost always their intention. Oh, and I do hope that my pieces actually do become an ongoing series, because they do "hit men" (of sorts), too. Yeah, really. Paid generously (with your money, by the way) to "remove" "difficult" ( their words; not mine) individuals. Like me. Stay tuned. See you again shortly. I hope. (PS: I think a feel a book coming on.) COMING NEXT : A drill-down on each of the 'D's. And next up after that: The detailed argument I'll put to the private sector on why hiring an ex-bureaucrat is a very bad idea ( Hint: You might think it gives you in-house lobbyist power and back-door influence, but the price you'll pay is the '5D' customer service anti-culture they'll foster throughout your organisation. Even IF you keep them away from the frontline, it will happen by osmosis anyway. And faster than you think. The worst part? The longer you keep them, the more irreversible the damage they'll seed in your culture. Which then hits your brand. And so on. So, to C-suites everywhere, this will be a read you NEED .
by Jordan Kelly 25 May 2025
Thousands Sign Up to 'Better Wellington' Movement, Seeking Urgent Cessation to Unaffordable Rates, Economic Decay and 'Wrong Direction' of City Council
by Jordan Kelly 20 May 2025
To the Silly Old Placard-Waving (& Terrorist-Supporting) Fools . . . As Seen Daily On the Corner of Chapel & Perry Streets in Masterton
by Jordan Kelly 18 May 2025
** READERS: SEE UPDATE AT END OF ARTICLE. - The Ed. ** Dear MDC Management, Do You Have Any Standards for Your Call Centre Contractors?
by Jordan Kelly 15 May 2025
Being Known As the Woman Who Introduced 'C---' into the New Zealand Parliament, Wasn't A Smart Long-Term Strategy
by Jordan Kelly 14 May 2025
Cheap Trumps Standards, Ethics & Compassion . . . Apparently
by Jordan Kelly 13 May 2025
A Massive Upside IF It's Done Right . . . and An Unrecoverable Downside It It's Not
Show More