Countdown's 'Everyday Rewards' Card & Your Privacy: Don't Say I Haven't Warned You
Jordan Kelly • 14 February 2024

If this doesn't creep you out, I don't know what will.


In a recent commentary - https://www.thecustomer.co.nz/supermarket-loyalty-cards-food-for-thought - I wrote of my suspicions about the new "Everyday Rewards" card that Countdown is pushing at customers (who can no longer use their One Card, which didn't require formal registration if you didn't want to, and which also now incorporates and replaces the former "Smart Fuel" card offered by BP service stations).


Clearly, the discounts they tempt (almost coerce by their "specials" pricing structure, in my opinion) shoppers with, to sign up to have their data reaped and their privacy obliterated, must be well outstripped by the variety of profits they make from said data.


This "data" that the almost-always-unread-by-customers fine print says they can collect and use, includes (and is probably not even limited to) your phone number and address, your licence plate, video of you, audio recordings of you, your date of birth, and your IP address.


Fully creeped out yet? You should be.


According to a New Zealand Herald article, these conditions are "tucked away under a privacy policy link in the terms and conditions of Everyday Rewards".


But "Woolworths states video footage and audio recordings are used for security, theft prevention and safety purposes only."


Yeah, right.


And "other information gathered online and in-store can be used so the supermarket knows 'what, how and when you buy from us and your stated or likely preferences”.


The Herald article says that the Office of the Privacy Commissioner has voiced concerns and said part of the Privacy Act required agencies to be “open and transparent about what personal information they collect”, which requires a company to be "more proactive than just putting it in deep in their privacy policy”.


Still quoting the Herald article:


"The use of CCTV and audio capture came with great responsibility and the Office of the Privacy Commissioner said those who operated the recordings needed to be aware of how to manage privacy issues.


“We always recommend that agencies minimise the amount of personal information they collect. Any information that is collected should also be securely disposed of once it’s no longer needed for the organisation’s purpose."


The Privacy Commissioner says that if facial recognition or staff body cameras are used, signage alerting the shopper to the fact they are being filmed needed to be prominent in-store.


Here's How the Sneaky Bastards Get Away With It (Which Is Contrary to the Privacy Commissioner's Advice)


A "Woolworths spokesman" claims the chain takes customer privacy and data security very seriously (of course) and "is mindful of its obligations under the Privacy Act".


Yeah, right.


SO mindful, in fact, that (continuing quoting him from the Herald article):


“Our privacy policy is easily accessible from a range of areas: there are privacy pages on both the Woolworths and Everyday Rewards websites, a direct link to the privacy policy upon registration for an Everyday Rewards memberships and the policy is included in the first couple of paragraphs of both the online and EDR T&Cs,” he said.


“There are also FAQs on the Woolworths Privacy Centre, which references video footage, audio and number plates as information collected.”


Like, we all live to dive deeply into the legalese on Woolworths' / Countdown's privacy policy pages and associated detail hide-outs, right?


It Gets Worse - Now You're On Staff's Body Cams, Too


Wooworths says that - when you're being recorded on staff's body cams - you'll be “verbally advised that it is being turned on”.


Supposedly, that part of the new Countdown shopping experience is only for acts or threats of aggression.


But if you trust these people, that's on you. I most certainly DO NOT. And I most certainly object even more strongly now to having their incredibly invasive data-gathering-and-compilation offer shoved down my throat on every visit.


I'd rather forego the "discounts" and pay full price. Although, I doubt that prevents them from scraping up your data any way they can, all the same.


This is getting more and more Big Brother all the time, don't you think? As if they don't already make enough profit from your purchases and the opportunism of the duopoly they enjoy in New Zealand's supermarket "sector".

Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 21 April 2025
AI & Robotics Expert Provides Commentary on Skinny's New 'Brand Ambassador'
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
Err . . . No Conflict of Interest Here, At All?
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
You Know It's Bad When Even Mainstream Medical Journals Are Forced to Report On It
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
More on the BUPA international chain of houses-of-horror . . .
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I've Been Tracking Abuse-in-Aged-Care-Facilities for A While Now . . . and Something HAS to Be Done About this Almighty Horror Show
by Jordan Kelly 18 April 2025
I'm SO Glad I Manage to Survive Without A Cell Phone . . .
by Jordan Kelly 5 March 2025
Breathing in Foul-Smelling Emissions from Over the Fence? House Filling up with Toxic Fumes? Getting Your Washing Smoked Out? Here Are Your Rights.
by Jordan Kelly 26 February 2025
Americans are in love with Karoline Leavitt, the new, 27-year-old Whitehouse Press Secretary. She is eloquent, has a razor-sharp wit and a speed-of-light response formulation time, is meticulously prepared . . . and is fiercely loyal to the boss. However . . . At this morning's press briefing she showed a crack - a potential big negative -in her otherwise impeccable and impenetrable modus operandi. The layman audience didn't pick it up; the glowing compliments continued to avalanche in. But I saw a hint of the old politician and traditional press secretary sleight of hand: When a reporter asked her about the seriousness of tonight's deadline for all Federal government staff to respond to Elon Musk's / DOGE's "send us 5 things you did last week" V2 email, she pulled out the old "reframe the question and monologue it back to something positive and be emphatic to take the emphasis off your redirection" trick. (It's between 9.47 minutes and 13.54 minutes in. Particularly note the clarity and simplicity of the second reporter's key question i.e. will Federal employees be fired if they ignore Musk's email for a second time ? Watch .) There it was . . . that tired old advice STILL given out to politicians by their media training PR consultant hacks. I've commented on this previously here . And while I think it's disingenuous to do it at all, it's wholly inadvisable to do it if you're not particularly good at it. Under the headline, ' Minister of Police vs Jack Tame ', I gave an in-action example, including with the link to the interview and the timestamp at which Mitchell embarrassed himself mightily (albeit he bulldozed on, completely oblivious). While Leavitt employed the technique (which I prefer to call a "tactic") skilfully, that skill was more of a mechanical one in her case.. Whereas, when Trump uses it (which he does frequently), he's a master at it. His charismatic natural slide into an alternative impassioned point or story is so natural. So, well . . . Trump. Trump will always get away with it. It's baked into his style. But Leavitt will only get away with it for as long as the puppy love phase lasts and her halo continues to shine so brightly. At some point, if she employs it too regularly, the average citizen out there in viewer land will realise that she's not actually answering the question. I don't think she'll ever be seen as negatively as Biden's "press secretary" (if you could call her that) Karine Jean-Pierre, of course, but Leavitt's podium is at such a currently great height that she has a long way to fall if she does. Notwithstanding her exuberant youth, captivating good looks and "don't fck with me" forceful manner, there's one thing that pisses off the press and the punters alike. And that's repeatedly not giving straight answers to straight questions. So it was a disappointment to see her pull this one out the bag so early in her tenure as hallowed Whitehouse Press Secretary - since its emergence doesn't augur well going forward. I mean, just to know that she would resort to it whenever she felt it expedient. The Observational Minutiae By way of further observation, watch carefully as the second reporter comes in with a determination to get the straight answer the first one didn't succeed in getting. At this point, if you're a keen observer of human behaviour and responses, you'll notice Leavitt is slightly pushed off her confident footing. She makes two grammatical stumbles: she first said "Elon come in" instead of "Elon came in". Then she transposed two words slightly further on. When the second reporter kept pressing her, she defensively snapped, "Are my press briefings not good enough for you, Jackie?" Not good. She doesn't like being pressed so hard. She needs to get used to it, or there'll be an increasing number of moments when she comes at least slightly unstuck behind the podium. 
by Jordan Kelly 25 February 2025
JUST IN: PRESS RELEASE FROM THE OFFICE OF REPUBLICAN SENATOR MIKE LEE OF UTAH. Calling for the United States' complete withdrawal from the UN, Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah has introduced the Disengaging Entirely from the United Nations Debacle (DEFUND) Act ,. The DEFUND Act "addresses grave issues of national sovereignty and fiscal accountability which have plagued US. involvement in the UN". Co-sponsored in the Senate by Republican Senators Marsha Blackburn and Rick Scott, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers and Representative Chip Roy (also Republicans) the accompanying comments by Senator Lee read: "No more blank checks for the United Nations. Americans' hard-earned dollars have been funneled into initiatives that fly in the face of our values, enabling tyrants, betraying allies, and spreading bigotry "With the DEFUND Act, we're stepping away from this debacle. If we engage with the UN in the future, it will be on our terms, with the full backing of the Senate and an iron-clad escape clause." He said the UN had betrayed U.S. trust repeatedly, and that the country should not "to be their cash cow" while the UN undermines the U.S.'s own national security and interests. Meantime, Senator Blackburn said: “ The DEFUND Act will stop all forms of U.S. financial support to the UN and hold this wayward organisation accountable for placating Hamas terrorists and the Chinese Communist Party.” Meantime, Senator Chip Roy commented: “From UNRWA actively protecting Hamas and acting against our ally Israel, and delaying condemnation of Hamas, to China being elected to the 'Human Rights Council,' to the propagation of climate hysteria, covering for China's forced abortion and sterilisation programs . . . the UN's decades-old, internal rot once again raises the questions of why the United States is even still a member or why we're wasting billions every year on it."
Show More