Up Your Comms Game, AA Insurance
Jordan Kelly • 16 January 2024

This morning I called AA Insurance to enquire when my vehicle insurance renewal notice would be forthcoming, being that I knew the current annual period expired in either January or February.


Learn to Articulate


The guy that answered mumbled something unintelligible and I immediately found myself entered into a phone queue.


After a few minutes, another, equally inarticulate operator answered, and in repeating what I thought he’d said his name was (Simon), he inelegantly corrected me (Not Simon).


I went on to explain (patiently) that it was important that call centre representatives be understandable to callers. Maybe their name isn’t that critical, but the other content of the call probably was.


Not Simon responded: “Is. That. Better.  …… ?”


Don’t Mock the Customer


I told him that I was making a reasonable and serious point, and that I didn’t appreciate being mocked.


He told me, disingenuously, that he was simply “changing his speech pattern” at my request.


I responded that I didn’t require him to change his speech pattern, merely to articulate sufficiently as to be understood. By way of example, I pointed to the fact that I had thought his name was Simon (and there’s nothing wrong with my hearing; I’m neither an old person nor am I deaf).


His response to that indicated that the conversation was likely to degenerate into further disrespect and/or defensiveness. So I informed him that I was a customer service commentator, told him I wasn’t prepared to continue the call, told him that I assumed the call was being recorded at his end, and left my phone number such that – should any management member of AA Insurance give a stuff about my points – they can call me to discuss.


I’ll make a further post at some point to let you know if they did.  Or. Not. 


Two Weeks Later . . .


A couple of weeks later, and no, predictably enough, no-one had called.


So I decided I better try my luck at getting a slightly more respectful operator, as I still hadn't achieved the objective of my original call.


The first operator was - to say the least - extremely curt in her phone answering manner. I pushed on, regardless, and achieved the first half of the objective with her. The second half of the objective required me to be transferred to another department.


The operator at this next department was everything a call centre representative should be:  polite, efficient, helpful . . . and affable. So - when she posed the template question with which all call centre reps appear to be instructed to end a call ("Is there anything else I can help you with today?") - I took the time to (and the risk of) telling her of the experience I'd had with the previous call to AA.


She was appropriately unimpressed with my experience, and looked for any notes that had (or should have) been made about the call, by the operator in question. She found none. Not good. Especially since I'd requested a call back from someone who cared.


She insisted that she convey the situation to her customer service department, who would call me to discuss my feedback.


She did, and they did.


And I was very impressed.


'Room for Improvement'


When the customer service department or management representative called me the very next working day, she had taken the time to listen to all calls associated with said feedback. And she agreed that, most certainly, there was "room for improvement" in the communications performance of their call centre operator.


With a mutual background in brand and marketing management, we ended up in a long and impassioned conversation about the importance of an organisation's first point of contact in the preservation of its brand reputation.


Our points of agreement are worth noting, for any enterprise - large or small - that values the investment it has made in its performance, its reputation, and its brand.


LESSONS:


1)  "Brand" is the total experience a customer has with the enterprise in question. It includes - but is not limited to - all points of interaction the customer has, at any time, with that enterprise.


2)  Chief amongst these influencing experiences are those interactions the customer has with the organisation's frontline personnel - whether in person, by phone, or online.


3)  Unless the customer has a long track record of positive associations with the brand, it takes far fewer negative experiences - proportionately - than positive experiences, for the customer to have an overall negative feeling towards the organisation and the brand.


4)  Where the customer is a relatively new acquisition for an enterprise, that enterprise's "brand" is only as good as the customer's most recent experience with it.


5)  Further to (3) and (4), a household-name brand has an invaluable asset in that brand, and simply cannot afford to have it tarnished by unseasoned or poorly trained frontline personnel.




Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 4 June 2025
Hey PowerCo: I Do NOT Appreciate You Giving Out My Email Address to Research Companies . . . Especially Those Who Treat YOUR Customers with Utter Contempt (& Spam Them)
by Jordan Kelly 3 June 2025
Why You Should Teach ALL Employees to Value Your Brand
by Jordan Kelly 26 May 2025
Ministry of Social Development Employee Sprays Around A Client's Private Information, then Sends It to A Journalist 
by Jordan Kelly 25 May 2025
Learn the Plays & Ploys of New Zealand Government Agencies to Beat Them At Their Own Sordid Game Since starting 'The Customer & The Constituent' back in January 2024, I've been learning things about the New Zealand political scene as it relates to Ministers and their Ministries (or agencies or bureaus), and also the behind-the-curtain Parliamentary machinations related to them. Things I almost wish now that I didn't know. But they're things that, for better or for worse, ALL New Zealanders should know, about the way the New Zealand Government and its "public service" really operates. If you don't know how things operate in reality (not just the PR fluff on their websites) in some of these big-name agencies that we are forced to deal with in one way or another, at some time or another, depending on the need or issue you're attempting to have solved or resolved, you could go around in ever-increasing frustrating circles for weeks, months and even years. Before getting absolutely nowhere . And the worst part is: That's the intention . The 5 D's 1) Delay 2) Defer 3) Deny 4) Defend 5) Dismissed They're largely self-explanatory, but it's an absolute playbook that they stick to, and apparently senior agency bureaucrats and Ministers and their staff are taught this as a rite of passage into parliamentary and career public "roles" . . . and then are sworn to secrecy over it, in a manner that almost has "Eyes Wide Shut" secret society overtones to it. You NEVER refer to the '5 D's' outside of the walls of inner sanctums. However, I'd add two more "D"s to their list: The sixth: Deaf (as in, Ignore). The seventh: Dumb .. And oh my goodness, let me count the ways (which I will do in further articles in this Series, in specific, detailed and named examples). So between your introduction herein to the 'D's', and my ongoing and, I hope, enlightening, series for your continuing and essential edification regarding How Wellington Really Works, I trust that you'll end up knowing how to deal with this sordid scene in a more strategic manner, for a less infuriating time, and maybe even with an outcome. Although there's no guarantee that any "outcome" won't be no outcome. Because that's almost always their intention. Oh, and I do hope that my pieces actually do become an ongoing series, because they do "hit men" (of sorts), too. Yeah, really. Paid generously (with your money, by the way) to "remove" "difficult" ( their words; not mine) individuals. Like me. Stay tuned. See you again shortly. I hope. (PS: I think a feel a book coming on.) COMING NEXT : A drill-down on each of the 'D's. And next up after that: The detailed argument I'll put to the private sector on why hiring an ex-bureaucrat is a very bad idea ( Hint: You might think it gives you in-house lobbyist power and back-door influence, but the price you'll pay is the '5D' customer service anti-culture they'll foster throughout your organisation. Even IF you keep them away from the frontline, it will happen by osmosis anyway. And faster than you think. The worst part? The longer you keep them, the more irreversible the damage they'll seed in your culture. Which then hits your brand. And so on. So, to C-suites everywhere, this will be a read you NEED .
by Jordan Kelly 25 May 2025
Thousands Sign Up to 'Better Wellington' Movement, Seeking Urgent Cessation to Unaffordable Rates, Economic Decay and 'Wrong Direction' of City Council
by Jordan Kelly 20 May 2025
To the Silly Old Placard-Waving (& Terrorist-Supporting) Fools . . . As Seen Daily On the Corner of Chapel & Perry Streets in Masterton
by Jordan Kelly 18 May 2025
** READERS: SEE UPDATE AT END OF ARTICLE. - The Ed. ** Dear MDC Management, Do You Have Any Standards for Your Call Centre Contractors?
by Jordan Kelly 15 May 2025
Being Known As the Woman Who Introduced 'C---' into the New Zealand Parliament, Wasn't A Smart Long-Term Strategy
by Jordan Kelly 14 May 2025
Cheap Trumps Standards, Ethics & Compassion . . . Apparently
by Jordan Kelly 13 May 2025
A Massive Upside IF It's Done Right . . . and An Unrecoverable Downside It It's Not
Show More