If You Want Your Story Published Here, Don't Do This . . .
Jordan Kelly • 17 September 2024

To Whom It Frigging Concerns (You Know Who You Are & Who You Might Be)

For anyone who might, at any time, wish to contact me - as others have - and suggest or request coverage, here's a heads-up in case you're part of that percentile of society that treats others like total shit:


Although, yes, I'm a real journalist, I also operate The Customer & The Constituent entirely as a "hobby".


Meaning, no-one pays me to do it and I don't make any money out of it.


The relevance?


When someone asks me to provide coverage of their achievement, topic or whatever - and you treat me like a disposable paper cup - it annoys me even more than it would if I were, say, a newspaper or television journalist working for a media enterprise and receiving a fortnightly pay cheque. They're on someone else's dime (whereas I'm not on any at all).


So here are some specific (as in, actually happened) examples of how I don't like to be treated.


I don't appreciate it when:


  • Someone emails me, drawing my attention to an item of mainstream media coverage of which their family member was the subject, offers me the exclusive opportunity to publish photographic evidence of an establishment's extremely poor conduct (because the photographs in question were too explosive for the media outlet to publish) . . . but then simply "gets busy" and doesn't bother to tell me they won't be answering my phone when I call to keep the arrangement they made with me.


  • The owner of a very interesting art-based business, keen to be the subject of a Special Feature, emails me a phone number and a request to call . . . and I call immediately upon receipt of the email, but their phone doesn't answer. I email back, and the email is never answered. A week or so later, another email rocks in saying how busy they had become (like, in the five minutes between my receipt of their email asking me to call, and my doing so) and asking me to call again. I call again and the whole process repeats itself. Several weeks later, another email arrives asking me to call again.


       Try not to be a moron. I mean, at least try.


  • The Parliamentarian who wants to work with me on ongoing weekly articles in a Special Feature Series covering her area of portfolio interest . . . then, after the first one, allows me to arrange my entire weekend around her Sunday afternoon availability, only to "forget" the second arrangement. And who, regarding subsequent arrangements, would copy me in on a last-minute email to her assistant, to reschedule for another specific day and time, on which she assumed I would have nothing better to do than to be sitting by the phone waiting for her to call at this, yet another rescheduled time of her exclusive convenience.


  • An interviewee (with whom I wanted to have a pre-publication fact-checking phone call) tells me to call him at 4pm . . . and I call three times within a 20-minute window surrounding 4pm, and no calls are answered. He finally answers and tells me he was in some impromptu meeting that was more important than the call he had asked me to make to him. As if that isn't insulting enough, he offers no explanation as to why, when he exited said meeting, he couldn't have returned the call that, again, he asked me to make.


So, RESPECT, OK?

Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 4 June 2025
Hey PowerCo: I Do NOT Appreciate You Giving Out My Email Address to Research Companies . . . Especially Those Who Treat YOUR Customers with Utter Contempt (& Spam Them)
by Jordan Kelly 3 June 2025
Why You Should Teach ALL Employees to Value Your Brand
by Jordan Kelly 26 May 2025
Ministry of Social Development Employee Sprays Around A Client's Private Information, then Sends It to A Journalist 
by Jordan Kelly 25 May 2025
Learn the Plays & Ploys of New Zealand Government Agencies to Beat Them At Their Own Sordid Game Since starting 'The Customer & The Constituent' back in January 2024, I've been learning things about the New Zealand political scene as it relates to Ministers and their Ministries (or agencies or bureaus), and also the behind-the-curtain Parliamentary machinations related to them. Things I almost wish now that I didn't know. But they're things that, for better or for worse, ALL New Zealanders should know, about the way the New Zealand Government and its "public service" really operates. If you don't know how things operate in reality (not just the PR fluff on their websites) in some of these big-name agencies that we are forced to deal with in one way or another, at some time or another, depending on the need or issue you're attempting to have solved or resolved, you could go around in ever-increasing frustrating circles for weeks, months and even years. Before getting absolutely nowhere . And the worst part is: That's the intention . The 5 D's 1) Delay 2) Defer 3) Deny 4) Defend 5) Dismissed They're largely self-explanatory, but it's an absolute playbook that they stick to, and apparently senior agency bureaucrats and Ministers and their staff are taught this as a rite of passage into parliamentary and career public "roles" . . . and then are sworn to secrecy over it, in a manner that almost has "Eyes Wide Shut" secret society overtones to it. You NEVER refer to the '5 D's' outside of the walls of inner sanctums. However, I'd add two more "D"s to their list: The sixth: Deaf (as in, Ignore). The seventh: Dumb .. And oh my goodness, let me count the ways (which I will do in further articles in this Series, in specific, detailed and named examples). So between your introduction herein to the 'D's', and my ongoing and, I hope, enlightening, series for your continuing and essential edification regarding How Wellington Really Works, I trust that you'll end up knowing how to deal with this sordid scene in a more strategic manner, for a less infuriating time, and maybe even with an outcome. Although there's no guarantee that any "outcome" won't be no outcome. Because that's almost always their intention. Oh, and I do hope that my pieces actually do become an ongoing series, because they do "hit men" (of sorts), too. Yeah, really. Paid generously (with your money, by the way) to "remove" "difficult" ( their words; not mine) individuals. Like me. Stay tuned. See you again shortly. I hope. (PS: I think a feel a book coming on.) COMING NEXT : A drill-down on each of the 'D's. And next up after that: The detailed argument I'll put to the private sector on why hiring an ex-bureaucrat is a very bad idea ( Hint: You might think it gives you in-house lobbyist power and back-door influence, but the price you'll pay is the '5D' customer service anti-culture they'll foster throughout your organisation. Even IF you keep them away from the frontline, it will happen by osmosis anyway. And faster than you think. The worst part? The longer you keep them, the more irreversible the damage they'll seed in your culture. Which then hits your brand. And so on. So, to C-suites everywhere, this will be a read you NEED .
by Jordan Kelly 25 May 2025
Thousands Sign Up to 'Better Wellington' Movement, Seeking Urgent Cessation to Unaffordable Rates, Economic Decay and 'Wrong Direction' of City Council
by Jordan Kelly 20 May 2025
To the Silly Old Placard-Waving (& Terrorist-Supporting) Fools . . . As Seen Daily On the Corner of Chapel & Perry Streets in Masterton
by Jordan Kelly 18 May 2025
** READERS: SEE UPDATE AT END OF ARTICLE. - The Ed. ** Dear MDC Management, Do You Have Any Standards for Your Call Centre Contractors?
by Jordan Kelly 15 May 2025
Being Known As the Woman Who Introduced 'C---' into the New Zealand Parliament, Wasn't A Smart Long-Term Strategy
by Jordan Kelly 14 May 2025
Cheap Trumps Standards, Ethics & Compassion . . . Apparently
by Jordan Kelly 13 May 2025
A Massive Upside IF It's Done Right . . . and An Unrecoverable Downside It It's Not
Show More