The Simplest Act of Professionalism . . . Why Do So Many SMEs & Solopreneurs Dismiss It?
Jordan Kelly • 6 December 2024

Why Would Small Business Operators & Other Solopreneurs Put So Much Effort Into their Operation and Promotion . . . And Yet Overlook This Most Basic of Professionalisms?

I don't know whether this is just a 'New Zealand thing' or not. My suspicion is that, whether or not it is, it's a whole lot more prevalent here than elsewhere. Having worked in many different countries, I've always noted how casual so many operators in the small business sector here are, when it comes to basic professionalism and customer service standards.


So much so that, I'm betting, most Kiwi small business and solo operators wouldn't even see what I'm about to write about as an issue at all.


But it is. Let me demonstrate why.


I'm referring to the extraordinarily lax attitude towards (a) phone contact-ability, and (b) the process of, and impression created by (c) frontline phone manners.


I'll give you two examples from - literally - this morning, in my world.


Just one morning. Let alone every time I (regularly) experience the likes of them. (Actually, I should probably say that, as far as (c) above goes, the phone manners issue relates to ALL businesses . . . and it's often outrageously bad even in some of the largest corporates - where the manners and attitude of frontline phone-answering or call centre personnel can be a total luck-of-the-draw situation, with nil consistency at all.)


Why Invest in Professional Promotional Materials If You Don't Bother with A Phone Manner that Matches?


On with the story. This morning, I took a punt that the lawnmowing service behind the quite professional-looking flyer I found in my letterbox yesterday, might also provide rubbish removal services.


So, I called the mobile number on the flyer. It rang and rang. And rang. Finally, it gave out an OGM (Outgoing Message) to the effect that, "the mailbox you're trying to access can't be reached". However, so keen was I to get rid of these empty boxes etc cluttering up my garage from my relocation of, now, a year ago, that I figured I'd give it another whirl.


This time the phone was answered . . . by a live human. Having assumed that the phone manner of someone who had gone to the expense of printing quite a professional flyer and expended the effort of running around letterboxing it, would have a phone manner to match that commitment to building his business, I was thrown off when the answerer just uttered a personal name or some word in rapid fire.


I mumbled something about the flyer, and asked if I had the right phone number. "Yes", was the curt response. 


On the back foot (never a good or strategic place for a keen and willing new customer to be), I told the answerer that while I already had a lawnmowing guy, did they do rubbish removal (because my lawnmowing guy doesn't)?


After some deliberation at that end (during which I waited uncomfortably on my end of the call), the answer appeared to be a "yes", but they'd need to come and have a look.


Anyway, all went well from there (as long as they turn up).


However, I think I'd be reasonably correct in assuming that the readers of The Customer would hardly need me to suggest a phone-answering process and manner more befitting of any business operation . . . whether "just" a one-man-band lawnmowing guy or not. Particularly one who had just invested in flyering a neighbourhood to build his business.


How Much Confidence Would You Have in this Highly Self-Promoted, Big-Ticket 'Professional'?


Next . . . and this one is way worse, given the nature of the business.


So, being that I'm still dealing with the health fall-out of a serious environmental exposure some time ago, a practitioner in the supplementary health field referred me to (apparently) a qualified functional doctor who had experience in this specific environmentally-related health issue.


This apparently respected practitioner's website (which included the logos of many news media outlets, seeming to posit that she'd been featured on same) indicated that her practice (she referred to her "team") had only a mobile phone number.


I called said mobile phone number and got some generic, AI-generated OGM . . . which could have been for any business, in any field, anywhere.


Yet this is a practitioner who charges $450 for a 50-minute consultation. And she feels she doesn't need to even have a credible phone number or even a personalised outgoing voicemail?


Remarkable. Is that how easy it is to make that sort of money from people on a desperate hunt for quality health advice / health care?


Not Isolated Incidences, Sadly


And these are hardly isolated incidences. Again, this is just one morning in the life of your Chief Reviewer.


If they weren't such commonly disheartening experiences - shared by many of my readers, I'm sure - I wouldn't bother even making mention of them.


But they are. In fact, many of you have commented to me that - for whatever reason - your customer service experiences have deteriorated markedly since the "Covid" years.

 

I'm not only incredulous that so many small business, and solo, operators don't view such a simple act of professional courtesy as necessary, I'm often actually affronted at the contempt that I feel as a customer otherwise intending to pay good money for their services, or even, in some instances, otherwise intending to become a regular client or customer. 

Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 4 June 2025
Hey PowerCo: I Do NOT Appreciate You Giving Out My Email Address to Research Companies . . . Especially Those Who Treat YOUR Customers with Utter Contempt (& Spam Them)
by Jordan Kelly 3 June 2025
Why You Should Teach ALL Employees to Value Your Brand
by Jordan Kelly 26 May 2025
Ministry of Social Development Employee Sprays Around A Client's Private Information, then Sends It to A Journalist 
by Jordan Kelly 25 May 2025
Learn the Plays & Ploys of New Zealand Government Agencies to Beat Them At Their Own Sordid Game Since starting 'The Customer & The Constituent' back in January 2024, I've been learning things about the New Zealand political scene as it relates to Ministers and their Ministries (or agencies or bureaus), and also the behind-the-curtain Parliamentary machinations related to them. Things I almost wish now that I didn't know. But they're things that, for better or for worse, ALL New Zealanders should know, about the way the New Zealand Government and its "public service" really operates. If you don't know how things operate in reality (not just the PR fluff on their websites) in some of these big-name agencies that we are forced to deal with in one way or another, at some time or another, depending on the need or issue you're attempting to have solved or resolved, you could go around in ever-increasing frustrating circles for weeks, months and even years. Before getting absolutely nowhere . And the worst part is: That's the intention . The 5 D's 1) Delay 2) Defer 3) Deny 4) Defend 5) Dismissed They're largely self-explanatory, but it's an absolute playbook that they stick to, and apparently senior agency bureaucrats and Ministers and their staff are taught this as a rite of passage into parliamentary and career public "roles" . . . and then are sworn to secrecy over it, in a manner that almost has "Eyes Wide Shut" secret society overtones to it. You NEVER refer to the '5 D's' outside of the walls of inner sanctums. However, I'd add two more "D"s to their list: The sixth: Deaf (as in, Ignore). The seventh: Dumb .. And oh my goodness, let me count the ways (which I will do in further articles in this Series, in specific, detailed and named examples). So between your introduction herein to the 'D's', and my ongoing and, I hope, enlightening, series for your continuing and essential edification regarding How Wellington Really Works, I trust that you'll end up knowing how to deal with this sordid scene in a more strategic manner, for a less infuriating time, and maybe even with an outcome. Although there's no guarantee that any "outcome" won't be no outcome. Because that's almost always their intention. Oh, and I do hope that my pieces actually do become an ongoing series, because they do "hit men" (of sorts), too. Yeah, really. Paid generously (with your money, by the way) to "remove" "difficult" ( their words; not mine) individuals. Like me. Stay tuned. See you again shortly. I hope. (PS: I think a feel a book coming on.) COMING NEXT : A drill-down on each of the 'D's. And next up after that: The detailed argument I'll put to the private sector on why hiring an ex-bureaucrat is a very bad idea ( Hint: You might think it gives you in-house lobbyist power and back-door influence, but the price you'll pay is the '5D' customer service anti-culture they'll foster throughout your organisation. Even IF you keep them away from the frontline, it will happen by osmosis anyway. And faster than you think. The worst part? The longer you keep them, the more irreversible the damage they'll seed in your culture. Which then hits your brand. And so on. So, to C-suites everywhere, this will be a read you NEED .
by Jordan Kelly 25 May 2025
Thousands Sign Up to 'Better Wellington' Movement, Seeking Urgent Cessation to Unaffordable Rates, Economic Decay and 'Wrong Direction' of City Council
by Jordan Kelly 20 May 2025
To the Silly Old Placard-Waving (& Terrorist-Supporting) Fools . . . As Seen Daily On the Corner of Chapel & Perry Streets in Masterton
by Jordan Kelly 18 May 2025
** READERS: SEE UPDATE AT END OF ARTICLE. - The Ed. ** Dear MDC Management, Do You Have Any Standards for Your Call Centre Contractors?
by Jordan Kelly 15 May 2025
Being Known As the Woman Who Introduced 'C---' into the New Zealand Parliament, Wasn't A Smart Long-Term Strategy
by Jordan Kelly 14 May 2025
Cheap Trumps Standards, Ethics & Compassion . . . Apparently
by Jordan Kelly 13 May 2025
A Massive Upside IF It's Done Right . . . and An Unrecoverable Downside It It's Not
Show More