NZ's Most Responsive MPs: Who Are They?
Jordan Kelly • 16 May 2024

What's the Primary Role of A Member of Parliament, If It's Not Representing His or Her Electorate's Constituents?

Some weeks back, I wrote to every Member of the New Zealand Parliament, interested to prompt their response with regard to how they treated approaches from their respective electorates' constituents, when a member of that electorate had an issue.


I'd done that because I'd been totally underwhelmed at the repeatedly beyond woeful performance of my own local Member of Parliament, Mike Butterick.


For the interest of The Customer NZ's readers - who are, of course, voters in this country - I'd like to provide the following commentary on the Ministers and MPs who took the time to acknowledge my email:


Prime Minister, the Right Hon. Christopher Luxon


Hats off to the PM's staff, and thank you to his "Correspondence Lead Advisor" Sonya Ford, who responded in less than two hours of receiving my email. 



The Right Hon. Chris Hipkins


(With my sincere apologies for my having inadvertently omitted this from my first publication of this article.)


The Leader of the Opposition's "Senior Correspondence Advisor", Dinah Okeby, was also prompt in her acknowledgement of my email and, meaningfully, included that she would pass on my comments to Minister Hipkins.


And that is what a good ministerial advisor should do. Well done.


MP for Christchurch Central, Duncan Webb


And hats off to Duncan Webb, whose responsiveness is exceeded only by his sense of humour.


Webb responded:  "That is outrageous – the last MP was much better."


That's an MP worth having as your elected representative.


MP for Te Tai Hauāuru, Debbie Ngarewa-Packer


Thank you to this MP's staff member, Tineka Kumeroa, who sent the polite, non-automated, same-day response to "acknowledge that this email has been received and noted".


MP for Kaikoura, Stuart Smith


Another MP worth actually having.


Smith answered my email personally. He wrote:


Dear Jordan,

 

Thank you for writing to me about The Customer NZ.

 

I endeavour to answer emails on the day that they are received and do my best to resolve constituent issues. That said, a resolution is not always possible.

 

This MP would likely get my vote purely for his responsiveness, if I lived in his electorate.


MP for Coromandel, Scott Simpson


Same-day acknowledgement from Simpson's "Community Engagement & Communications Advisor", Cherie Staples - although Cherie unfortunately didn't take the time to read the actual text of my email to realise that I wasn't in Simpson's electorate and simply sent a standard template response.


But at least it was a response, and not an auto-responder, or worse still, radio silence.


MP for Banks Peninsula, Vanessa Weenink


I'm not sure if this was recognition or a polite chastisement (I think it was the latter) . . . but at least she wrote it herself:


Hi Jordan,

 

It’s helpful when people do identify themselves as constituents of my electorate, because with the volume of emails some triage is required. I am focusing on my local issues and where I have a role to play.

 

Best wishes, Vanessa Weenink


MP for Otaki, Tim Costley


I was over the moon to get the following response . . . .


Hi Jordan,

 

Thank you for getting in touch.

 

I can’t comment on what my colleagues do but, in my electorate, I am passionate about helping the community in any way I can. I try to get out and visit as many people and places as I can in my electorate.

 

Kind regards, Tim Costley


. . . . but I crashed from a great height after I sent him a request for an interview (subject:  A Month In the Life of A Community-Responsive MP). and he completely ignored me!


Green Party, Co-Leader, Chlöe Swarbrick


While Swarbrick's response was in the form of an auto-responder, what impressed me was that the auto-responder included something no other politician's auto-responder had:  the direct email address of her executive assistant, and an invitation to email her if the matter was urgent.


I felt that showed a degree of caring and political responsibility that was worthy of note.


MP for Panmure–Ōtāhuhu, Jenny Salesa


Top marks to Salesa's "Senior MP Support" staff member, Michael Clatworthy, who took exactly 25 minutes to respond, personally:


Morning Jordan

 

Thank you for emailing, I can confirm on behalf of Jenny that all electorate correspondence is acknowledged and responded to in a timely manner.

 

Ngā mihi, Michael Clatworthy


A great person to have on your team if you're a busy MP that cares about your constituents. MPs, take note if you're looking for a senior support staff member of that ilk. Very impressive.


MP for Rangitata, James Meager


And from another MP support staffer well worth any MP on the market for one, watching out for . . . a prompt, polite and useful response promising to take the action that she was capable of taking, as relevant to my email:


Hi Jordan

 

Just acknowledging your email and will make sure that James receives it.

 

Kind regards

 

Judy

 

Judy Cunningham

Team Coordinator

 

List MP, Damien O'Connor


Obviously a man that doesn't waste words, O'Connor took a moment to respond to me personally:


"Always tried."  (In response to my question as to whether he'd offer greater respect and communications performance than my local MP.)


Read Receipt Courtesies


The following MPs (or their staff members) at least had the professional courtesy to return the automated "read receipt" request I assigned to my email to them.


A small consideration, but one that - in my estimation - demonstrates a decent degree of professionalism:


Rt. Hon. Chris Hipkins, Laura Trask, Andy Foster, Rima Nakhle, Priyanca Radhakrishnan, Tracey McLellan, Hamish Campbell, Mark Cameron . . . and someone from Chloe Swarbrick's office actually read my email, in addition to my above mention, because I received the read receipt on my email to her, in addition. (A belated addition to this list is Celia Wade-Brown, whose read receipt came in some days later, and I missed it when initially collating responses.)


As For the Rest . . .


(With apologies to any Minister or Member of Parliament who did respond and whose response I have inadvertently missed) . . . the rest of the current New Zealand political set either ignored my email, or my email to their inbox generated the most useless, almost-universally-identical auto-responder.


If you've ever seen that (again, almost carbon copy auto-responder), I'll paraphrase the way it comes across to me:


"Yeah, look, would you mind buggering off. We get LOADS of emails from the likes of pesky constituents like you, and - unless you've got a speaking engagement offer of significant political value to me - not interested. Ta ta. Have a good day."

Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 4 June 2025
Hey PowerCo: I Do NOT Appreciate You Giving Out My Email Address to Research Companies . . . Especially Those Who Treat YOUR Customers with Utter Contempt (& Spam Them)
by Jordan Kelly 3 June 2025
Why You Should Teach ALL Employees to Value Your Brand
by Jordan Kelly 26 May 2025
Ministry of Social Development Employee Sprays Around A Client's Private Information, then Sends It to A Journalist 
by Jordan Kelly 25 May 2025
Learn the Plays & Ploys of New Zealand Government Agencies to Beat Them At Their Own Sordid Game Since starting 'The Customer & The Constituent' back in January 2024, I've been learning things about the New Zealand political scene as it relates to Ministers and their Ministries (or agencies or bureaus), and also the behind-the-curtain Parliamentary machinations related to them. Things I almost wish now that I didn't know. But they're things that, for better or for worse, ALL New Zealanders should know, about the way the New Zealand Government and its "public service" really operates. If you don't know how things operate in reality (not just the PR fluff on their websites) in some of these big-name agencies that we are forced to deal with in one way or another, at some time or another, depending on the need or issue you're attempting to have solved or resolved, you could go around in ever-increasing frustrating circles for weeks, months and even years. Before getting absolutely nowhere . And the worst part is: That's the intention . The 5 D's 1) Delay 2) Defer 3) Deny 4) Defend 5) Dismissed They're largely self-explanatory, but it's an absolute playbook that they stick to, and apparently senior agency bureaucrats and Ministers and their staff are taught this as a rite of passage into parliamentary and career public "roles" . . . and then are sworn to secrecy over it, in a manner that almost has "Eyes Wide Shut" secret society overtones to it. You NEVER refer to the '5 D's' outside of the walls of inner sanctums. However, I'd add two more "D"s to their list: The sixth: Deaf (as in, Ignore). The seventh: Dumb .. And oh my goodness, let me count the ways (which I will do in further articles in this Series, in specific, detailed and named examples). So between your introduction herein to the 'D's', and my ongoing and, I hope, enlightening, series for your continuing and essential edification regarding How Wellington Really Works, I trust that you'll end up knowing how to deal with this sordid scene in a more strategic manner, for a less infuriating time, and maybe even with an outcome. Although there's no guarantee that any "outcome" won't be no outcome. Because that's almost always their intention. Oh, and I do hope that my pieces actually do become an ongoing series, because they do "hit men" (of sorts), too. Yeah, really. Paid generously (with your money, by the way) to "remove" "difficult" ( their words; not mine) individuals. Like me. Stay tuned. See you again shortly. I hope. (PS: I think a feel a book coming on.) COMING NEXT : A drill-down on each of the 'D's. And next up after that: The detailed argument I'll put to the private sector on why hiring an ex-bureaucrat is a very bad idea ( Hint: You might think it gives you in-house lobbyist power and back-door influence, but the price you'll pay is the '5D' customer service anti-culture they'll foster throughout your organisation. Even IF you keep them away from the frontline, it will happen by osmosis anyway. And faster than you think. The worst part? The longer you keep them, the more irreversible the damage they'll seed in your culture. Which then hits your brand. And so on. So, to C-suites everywhere, this will be a read you NEED .
by Jordan Kelly 25 May 2025
Thousands Sign Up to 'Better Wellington' Movement, Seeking Urgent Cessation to Unaffordable Rates, Economic Decay and 'Wrong Direction' of City Council
by Jordan Kelly 20 May 2025
To the Silly Old Placard-Waving (& Terrorist-Supporting) Fools . . . As Seen Daily On the Corner of Chapel & Perry Streets in Masterton
by Jordan Kelly 18 May 2025
** READERS: SEE UPDATE AT END OF ARTICLE. - The Ed. ** Dear MDC Management, Do You Have Any Standards for Your Call Centre Contractors?
by Jordan Kelly 15 May 2025
Being Known As the Woman Who Introduced 'C---' into the New Zealand Parliament, Wasn't A Smart Long-Term Strategy
by Jordan Kelly 14 May 2025
Cheap Trumps Standards, Ethics & Compassion . . . Apparently
by Jordan Kelly 13 May 2025
A Massive Upside IF It's Done Right . . . and An Unrecoverable Downside It It's Not
Show More