My Submission Against the Gene Technology Bill: DEADLINE IS FEBRUARY 17 (Super-Tight, So They Can Ram It Through)
Jordan Kelly • 12 February 2025

Readers:  If You Want to Stop this Irreversible Horror from Being Perpetuated Upon New Zealand and New Zealanders, Get Your Submission in FAST.

Here's the full text of my own submission . . . you can copy any part of it you wish, to help inform or formulate your own submission.  (NB: Despite the rushed deadline Collins & Co in the 'hive have imposed, the process of making the submission is very easy.)


In addition to the commentary I will provide in this field form, I also wish for my published article - i.e. on my publication, 'The Customer & The Constituent', to form part of my submission: Gene Tech Bill 2024: Should We 'Follow the Money', As Usual?


The problem I personally have with this horrendous, unethical, and wide and irreversible-damage rendering proposed legislation is just about everything – from the fact that the Bill:


  • Abandons the precautionary principle;


  •  Fails to mandate safety standards or ethical guidelines to prevent harm to humans, animals, or ecosystems (note specifically that there is no consideration of animal welfare or long-term ecological impacts);


  • Has NO labelling requirements (denying consumers and farmers the ability to make informed choices and thus violating the principle of consent);


  • Is a threat to non-GMO agriculture and horticulture (through the Bill’s prevention of councils’ right to declare GMO-free zones);


  • Will see the immediate loss of New Zealand’s “clean and green” reputation in our high-value export markets;


  • Will see unremediable contamination obviously and unavoidably occur on a broad and national scale . . . 


and more. MUCH more . . . including that which concerns me most of all (as though all the preceding weren’t bad enough) i.e. that it runs roughshod over an individual’s bodily autonomy and all issues surrounding any form of consent.


This latter issue, therefore, is the one I will choose to focus on in my submission:


Bodily Autonomy and Public Consent: Mandatory Authorisations Based on Overseas Approvals


This Bill allows “mandatory medical activity authorisations”  for gene technology-based medicines or therapies "that have been approved by two overseas regulators" - bypassing New Zealand’s own regulatory scrutiny and poses significant risks: 


These authorisations remove the opportunity for New Zealand to independently assess the safety, efficacy, and appropriateness of these technologies for its unique population . . . and, also prevent every individual citizen conducting their own assessment based on their own needs, preferences, concerns, and uniqueness of biology.


Different populations and environments may respond differently to medical interventions – as does each and every individual.  Without local trials and reviews, risks specific to New Zealanders may go undetected. And how, tell me, do you conduct safety trials for each and every individual’s own uniquenesses? 


Have you learned absolutely nothing from the death, disabilities, and other forms of biological carnage that the Covid “vaccines” left in their wake – and that continue to do so, even to this day, AND that will continue to do so throughout the lives of many of those who took them – whether or not they have yet been adversely affected? 


Is there no concern for this and for the horrendously broad scale of it, as well as for the complete unaccountability of those in the chain of both manufacture and decision-making that led to the impacts on these tens of thousands of individuals (and their families and their workplaces) in New Zealand?


There appears to be a convenient refusal by politicians and other vested interests to resolutely ignore these impacts or to learn any lessons whatsoever from the COVID-19 mRNA disaster: 


Again, my key point in summary:


The COVID-19 mRNA gene therapy vaccines, fast-tracked under emergency authorisations and heavily influenced by overseas regulators, have caused significant harm in New Zealand.


Many thousands of Kiwis have reported injuries, and there have been substantial numbers of deaths linked to these substances


This tragic experience underscores the critical need for rigorous local oversight and safety assessments before approving gene technology-based medical interventions – AND to NEVER, EVER FORCE these on ANY individual, INCLUDING not just without their permission but also, unfathomably (as the Bill intends in some applications and forms), without even their knowledge.


JUST IN:  A new series of revelations about the known dangers of mRNA technology (even as the Covid shots were rolled out) from the United Kingdom's Covid Inquiry and the first U.S. state introduces a Bill to ban such mRNA experimentation on its populace.

Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 4 June 2025
Hey PowerCo: I Do NOT Appreciate You Giving Out My Email Address to Research Companies . . . Especially Those Who Treat YOUR Customers with Utter Contempt (& Spam Them)
by Jordan Kelly 3 June 2025
Why You Should Teach ALL Employees to Value Your Brand
by Jordan Kelly 26 May 2025
Ministry of Social Development Employee Sprays Around A Client's Private Information, then Sends It to A Journalist 
by Jordan Kelly 25 May 2025
Learn the Plays & Ploys of New Zealand Government Agencies to Beat Them At Their Own Sordid Game Since starting 'The Customer & The Constituent' back in January 2024, I've been learning things about the New Zealand political scene as it relates to Ministers and their Ministries (or agencies or bureaus), and also the behind-the-curtain Parliamentary machinations related to them. Things I almost wish now that I didn't know. But they're things that, for better or for worse, ALL New Zealanders should know, about the way the New Zealand Government and its "public service" really operates. If you don't know how things operate in reality (not just the PR fluff on their websites) in some of these big-name agencies that we are forced to deal with in one way or another, at some time or another, depending on the need or issue you're attempting to have solved or resolved, you could go around in ever-increasing frustrating circles for weeks, months and even years. Before getting absolutely nowhere . And the worst part is: That's the intention . The 5 D's 1) Delay 2) Defer 3) Deny 4) Defend 5) Dismissed They're largely self-explanatory, but it's an absolute playbook that they stick to, and apparently senior agency bureaucrats and Ministers and their staff are taught this as a rite of passage into parliamentary and career public "roles" . . . and then are sworn to secrecy over it, in a manner that almost has "Eyes Wide Shut" secret society overtones to it. You NEVER refer to the '5 D's' outside of the walls of inner sanctums. However, I'd add two more "D"s to their list: The sixth: Deaf (as in, Ignore). The seventh: Dumb .. And oh my goodness, let me count the ways (which I will do in further articles in this Series, in specific, detailed and named examples). So between your introduction herein to the 'D's', and my ongoing and, I hope, enlightening, series for your continuing and essential edification regarding How Wellington Really Works, I trust that you'll end up knowing how to deal with this sordid scene in a more strategic manner, for a less infuriating time, and maybe even with an outcome. Although there's no guarantee that any "outcome" won't be no outcome. Because that's almost always their intention. Oh, and I do hope that my pieces actually do become an ongoing series, because they do "hit men" (of sorts), too. Yeah, really. Paid generously (with your money, by the way) to "remove" "difficult" ( their words; not mine) individuals. Like me. Stay tuned. See you again shortly. I hope. (PS: I think a feel a book coming on.) COMING NEXT : A drill-down on each of the 'D's. And next up after that: The detailed argument I'll put to the private sector on why hiring an ex-bureaucrat is a very bad idea ( Hint: You might think it gives you in-house lobbyist power and back-door influence, but the price you'll pay is the '5D' customer service anti-culture they'll foster throughout your organisation. Even IF you keep them away from the frontline, it will happen by osmosis anyway. And faster than you think. The worst part? The longer you keep them, the more irreversible the damage they'll seed in your culture. Which then hits your brand. And so on. So, to C-suites everywhere, this will be a read you NEED .
by Jordan Kelly 25 May 2025
Thousands Sign Up to 'Better Wellington' Movement, Seeking Urgent Cessation to Unaffordable Rates, Economic Decay and 'Wrong Direction' of City Council
by Jordan Kelly 20 May 2025
To the Silly Old Placard-Waving (& Terrorist-Supporting) Fools . . . As Seen Daily On the Corner of Chapel & Perry Streets in Masterton
by Jordan Kelly 18 May 2025
** READERS: SEE UPDATE AT END OF ARTICLE. - The Ed. ** Dear MDC Management, Do You Have Any Standards for Your Call Centre Contractors?
by Jordan Kelly 15 May 2025
Being Known As the Woman Who Introduced 'C---' into the New Zealand Parliament, Wasn't A Smart Long-Term Strategy
by Jordan Kelly 14 May 2025
Cheap Trumps Standards, Ethics & Compassion . . . Apparently
by Jordan Kelly 13 May 2025
A Massive Upside IF It's Done Right . . . and An Unrecoverable Downside It It's Not
Show More