More Dodgy, 'Paid-Off' Research from the WHO Aiming to Convince that EMF & RF Radiation Doesn't Harm
Jordan Kelly • 8 September 2024

More Bad Research from the 'World Health Organisation'

Guest contributor and expert on Electromagnetic Pollution and its health effects, EMR Australia founder Lyn McLean, provides another authoritative commentary on dodgy research aiming to falsely convince the public that the currently allowable levels of electromagnetic frequencies (EMF) and radio frequencies (RF) aren't at all harmful to human biology (including, of course, our children).


(By Lyn McLean, Founder, EMR Australia)


Just when evidence that radio frequency radiation causes oxidative stress (which harms the body) has become compelling, the WHO produces a study casting doubt on that evidence.


How did it do that?


By ignoring 99% of the relevant research.


The study was commissioned and partly funded by the World Health Organisation and conducted by Felix Meyer.


It concluded that  ‘The evidence on the relation between the exposure to RF-EMF and biomarkers of oxidative stress was of very low certainty.’  1


Scientists Calling Foul on the WHO; Want Study Retracted


However, scientists are calling for the study to be retracted because it ignored such a large percentage of the relevant research and it did not adequately consider the "dynamic nature" of oxidative stress.2


There is now a large body of evidence showing that radio frequency radiation causes oxidative stress, which occurs in cancer, diabetes, congenital malformations and neuro-degenerative diseases. It’s also linked with the hardening of blood vessels, inflammation, high blood pressure, heart disease and ageing.


Just last week, EMR Australia reported evidence that electromagnetic pollution causes oxidative stress and ROS (Reactive Oxygen Species), whose toxic bi-products may cause an auto-immune reaction. This, the authors say, could explain the symptoms of people who develop symptoms from exposure.3


Meyer’s study is the third of three systematic reviews produced by the WHO that experts claim should be retracted.


1.  Felix Meyer, Annette Bitsch, Henry Jay Forman, Athanassios Fragoulis, Pietro Ghezzi, Bernd Henschenmacher, Rupert Kellner, Jens Kuhne, Tonia Ludwig, Dmitrij Sachno, Gernot Schmid, Katya Tsaioun, Jos Verbeek, Robert Wright, ‘The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure on biomarkers of oxidative stress in vivo and in vitro:
A systematic review of experimental studies,’
Environment International, 2024, 108940, ISSN 0160-4120.


2. Dr Louis Slesin, ‘Another WHO RF Review Challenged’, Microwave News, 21.8.24


3.  Mobile phone specific radiation disturbs cytokinesis and causes cell death but not acute chromosomal damage in buccal cells: Results of a controlled human intervention stud, Kundi, Michael, Nersesyan, Armen, Schmid, Gernot, Hutter, Hans-Peter, Eibensteiner, Florian, Mišík, Miroslav, Knasmüller, Siegfried, Environmental Research, Vol 251, pt 1, June 2024, 118634, 0013-9351. – see https://emraustralia.com.au/blogs/news-1/new-findings-on-mobile-phones-and-brain-tumours?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=more_bad_research_from_the_who&utm_term=2024-09-07.


Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 4 June 2025
Hey PowerCo: I Do NOT Appreciate You Giving Out My Email Address to Research Companies . . . Especially Those Who Treat YOUR Customers with Utter Contempt (& Spam Them)
by Jordan Kelly 3 June 2025
Why You Should Teach ALL Employees to Value Your Brand
by Jordan Kelly 26 May 2025
Ministry of Social Development Employee Sprays Around A Client's Private Information, then Sends It to A Journalist 
by Jordan Kelly 25 May 2025
Learn the Plays & Ploys of New Zealand Government Agencies to Beat Them At Their Own Sordid Game Since starting 'The Customer & The Constituent' back in January 2024, I've been learning things about the New Zealand political scene as it relates to Ministers and their Ministries (or agencies or bureaus), and also the behind-the-curtain Parliamentary machinations related to them. Things I almost wish now that I didn't know. But they're things that, for better or for worse, ALL New Zealanders should know, about the way the New Zealand Government and its "public service" really operates. If you don't know how things operate in reality (not just the PR fluff on their websites) in some of these big-name agencies that we are forced to deal with in one way or another, at some time or another, depending on the need or issue you're attempting to have solved or resolved, you could go around in ever-increasing frustrating circles for weeks, months and even years. Before getting absolutely nowhere . And the worst part is: That's the intention . The 5 D's 1) Delay 2) Defer 3) Deny 4) Defend 5) Dismissed They're largely self-explanatory, but it's an absolute playbook that they stick to, and apparently senior agency bureaucrats and Ministers and their staff are taught this as a rite of passage into parliamentary and career public "roles" . . . and then are sworn to secrecy over it, in a manner that almost has "Eyes Wide Shut" secret society overtones to it. You NEVER refer to the '5 D's' outside of the walls of inner sanctums. However, I'd add two more "D"s to their list: The sixth: Deaf (as in, Ignore). The seventh: Dumb .. And oh my goodness, let me count the ways (which I will do in further articles in this Series, in specific, detailed and named examples). So between your introduction herein to the 'D's', and my ongoing and, I hope, enlightening, series for your continuing and essential edification regarding How Wellington Really Works, I trust that you'll end up knowing how to deal with this sordid scene in a more strategic manner, for a less infuriating time, and maybe even with an outcome. Although there's no guarantee that any "outcome" won't be no outcome. Because that's almost always their intention. Oh, and I do hope that my pieces actually do become an ongoing series, because they do "hit men" (of sorts), too. Yeah, really. Paid generously (with your money, by the way) to "remove" "difficult" ( their words; not mine) individuals. Like me. Stay tuned. See you again shortly. I hope. (PS: I think a feel a book coming on.) COMING NEXT : A drill-down on each of the 'D's. And next up after that: The detailed argument I'll put to the private sector on why hiring an ex-bureaucrat is a very bad idea ( Hint: You might think it gives you in-house lobbyist power and back-door influence, but the price you'll pay is the '5D' customer service anti-culture they'll foster throughout your organisation. Even IF you keep them away from the frontline, it will happen by osmosis anyway. And faster than you think. The worst part? The longer you keep them, the more irreversible the damage they'll seed in your culture. Which then hits your brand. And so on. So, to C-suites everywhere, this will be a read you NEED .
by Jordan Kelly 25 May 2025
Thousands Sign Up to 'Better Wellington' Movement, Seeking Urgent Cessation to Unaffordable Rates, Economic Decay and 'Wrong Direction' of City Council
by Jordan Kelly 20 May 2025
To the Silly Old Placard-Waving (& Terrorist-Supporting) Fools . . . As Seen Daily On the Corner of Chapel & Perry Streets in Masterton
by Jordan Kelly 18 May 2025
** READERS: SEE UPDATE AT END OF ARTICLE. - The Ed. ** Dear MDC Management, Do You Have Any Standards for Your Call Centre Contractors?
by Jordan Kelly 15 May 2025
Being Known As the Woman Who Introduced 'C---' into the New Zealand Parliament, Wasn't A Smart Long-Term Strategy
by Jordan Kelly 14 May 2025
Cheap Trumps Standards, Ethics & Compassion . . . Apparently
by Jordan Kelly 13 May 2025
A Massive Upside IF It's Done Right . . . and An Unrecoverable Downside It It's Not
Show More