Why This Minister's Shock-and-Awe Viral Moment Won't Age (or Internationalise) Well
Jordan Kelly • 15 May 2025

Being Known As the Woman Who Introduced 'C---' into the New Zealand Parliament, Wasn't A Smart Long-Term Strategy

As a journalist, a multiple-times-published marketing and business book author, but most especially as a leadership PR professional with Parliamentary press secretary experience (albeit that part was decades ago), here’s my humble opinion on why Minister Brooke van Velden’s retort to a senior Stuff  journalist’s column contents, didn’t exactly demonstrate long-term smarts.


The overarching point I would make is that context is everything, and in the passage of time, the back story and the context of the viral moment will almost certainly be lost, and the otherwise well-spoken Minister will go down in history more simply as the female Minister who introduced the "C-word" to the floor of the New Zealand Parliament.


Don't believe me? It's often the headlines that readers and internet surfers take greater note of than the content . . . especially if they were just surfing and didn't click on the segment in the first place. On that note, try these:


C-bomb dropped in Parliament as tensions flare over pay equity amendments   Stuff.co.nz    (Stuff immediately takes the opportunity to go out-of-context and make the victim appear as the perpetrator. You might have seen that one coming, Minister. Like, a mile off.)


Brooke van Velden drops C-word in Parliament   RNZ     You KNOW the leftist mainstream media hates your guts. WHY did you hand them your reputation on a platter?


New Zealand MP uses ‘C’ word in speech over ‘misogynistic’ paper column        The Project   Ditto.


"C*nts": Brooke van Velden fires back against Vance and Tinetti's sexist abuse    | ACT    The headline used by your own Party's YouTube channel! If the comms advisor responsible for that  thumbnail headline has an IQ sufficient to successfully operate a door handle, they hid it well.


Notice, all these headlines are centred on van Velden “using the C-word” in Parliament . . . not on the context of her giving voice to the associated journalist’s related intention to disparage and distress her female colleagues. Again, you should have seen every one of them coming. A savvy response would have been no  response, and the wisened Speaker of the House sagely and valiantly attempted to guide you into taking that course. Had you accepted his counsel, it would have cut off the undeserved oxygen supply to Vance's awful piece right there.


You've got to stay one step ahead of the media, not play right into their hands - especially when their knives are continually out for you. Now you have them taking the added opportunity to accuse you of using Vance's content to distract from your own supposed assault against working women - as you already struggle to recover from the cock-up that has been the framing and handling of that little tidy-up "initiative". (Honestly, what Polytech pool do you fish from for your comms advisors?)


Unwise from A Career Perspective


Back to these short, viral internet clips that are without context (and the fact that you should have thought ahead to that).


These little virally grabs (sans back story) are the nature of what is grabbed and retained across the months and the years on the internet across passing news cycles.


Over the longer haul, and across a geographically far broader viewer base, it will be the Minister who is remembered as bringing the term in question to the floor of the New Zealand Parliament. See Exhibits A, B, C and D above.


Unwise from A Personal Image Perspective


Making her point in this manner and retaining her dignity after having done so, requires the Minister to rely on the context of her (self-)perception i.e. as a "calm” and “non-sweary” (her self-descriptor) operator.


What’s wrong with that? Assuming she's well-enough known and as that particular persona, it's still at best by a limited audience i.e. those who know her, or who regularly observe her political and professional performances. She can’t, at this relatively early stage in her Parliamentary career, be assumed as having an established "calm and non-sweary" reputation across a wider, national audience, and certainly not across an international audience.


And she certainly hasn't got one now. She said she "wanted to hold up a mirror". The problem: She forgot to check which way the mirror was facing.


Unwise from A Personal Confidence Perspective


The Minister’s nervousness in yesterday afternoon’s post-expletive foyer press conference was palpable.


Notwithstanding that she can appear on The Platform and be lauded by Sean Plunket and a couple of his callers for her ballsy performance, on the other side of the coin, given the mixed reactions to the moment, at the same time she’s created a self-consciousness for herself that could stick around in her own psyche for some time.


Whenever this occurrence is raised in a public or group setting, she's made herself vulnerable to criticism that is likely to be lasting, despite any weight of numbers of those who were enamoured (or perhaps just initially enamoured) with her “shock-and-awe” viral moment.


Unwise from A New Zealand Parliamentary & International Perspective


The New Zealand Parliament's image is still reeling internationally from the Maori Party’s haka "performance" (from the Right, 'How New Zealand's Parliament Became A Viral Laughing Stock' all the way through the media leanings spectrum to the Left, 'Māori MPs perform haka and disrupt NZ parliament debate on treaty rights changes'.


We already look like a bunch of bananas after that little display.


From an international interest perspective, no-one will have paid any notice to anything about the little backwater New Zealand Parliamentary scene between then and this new viral moment.


How does that make the New Zealand Parliament look out there in the wider world?


And as far as "being a strong woman" and showing us how it's done, arguably, what message about New Zealand women does this send to the global audience? (NB: I myself can swear like a trooper, so I'm not attempting to come across all horrified and holy. I'm just pointing out that you shouldn't have risked giving the world the impression that all "strong New Zealand women" keep that term at ready reach in their handbags, to fend off misogyny attacks.)


Compare It to the Fiery Yet Strategic 2012 'Misogyny Speech' by Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard . . .. the 'Greatest Moment in Aussie TV History'


Compare van Velden's determination to commit her shock-and-awe (I see it as) disaster, to the greatest misogynist-rebutting retort of all time by a politician: that of Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard in 2012.


Known as 'The Misogyny Speech', it has been widely and internationally voted as the greatest moment in Australian television history. That's because the sharp-minded Gillard – capitalising  on raw emotion but NOT having her long-term smarts hijacked by it  – ensured that the full context of the lengthy and impassioned retort would be inseparable from the actual speech itself.


So . . . Minister van Velden, THIS is how you take down misogynistic attacks on senior female Parliamentarians. Take heed and take notes:


A Timeless, International Precedent

  

And so I give to you, Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard and her immortalised 2012 “misogyny speech”, responding to the heinous conduct of then-Opposition Leader, Tony Abbott. (It doesn't matter how many times I watch it, it still sends tingling sensations through my spinal cord.)


Here's a taste of viewers’ 20,000 comments under this one video alone (with its 7.2 million views):

 

“She dug that man a grave and said, 'Don’t be shy, step in.’”

 

“This is literally what that man is now going to be known and remembered for. Amazing.”

 

“She came with receipts. Honestly, I'm surprised he didn't start crying. She destroyed him.”

 

“This woman made me feel like a strong, intelligent Australian woman and I'm an African man.”

 

“The thing I love the most is she NEVER, not once, let her flow get interrupted by heckling. Calm, measured, firm, yet schooled rage.”


Do you see the difference, Ms van Velden?

Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 4 June 2025
Hey PowerCo: I Do NOT Appreciate You Giving Out My Email Address to Research Companies . . . Especially Those Who Treat YOUR Customers with Utter Contempt (& Spam Them)
by Jordan Kelly 3 June 2025
Why You Should Teach ALL Employees to Value Your Brand
by Jordan Kelly 26 May 2025
Ministry of Social Development Employee Sprays Around A Client's Private Information, then Sends It to A Journalist 
by Jordan Kelly 25 May 2025
Learn the Plays & Ploys of New Zealand Government Agencies to Beat Them At Their Own Sordid Game Since starting 'The Customer & The Constituent' back in January 2024, I've been learning things about the New Zealand political scene as it relates to Ministers and their Ministries (or agencies or bureaus), and also the behind-the-curtain Parliamentary machinations related to them. Things I almost wish now that I didn't know. But they're things that, for better or for worse, ALL New Zealanders should know, about the way the New Zealand Government and its "public service" really operates. If you don't know how things operate in reality (not just the PR fluff on their websites) in some of these big-name agencies that we are forced to deal with in one way or another, at some time or another, depending on the need or issue you're attempting to have solved or resolved, you could go around in ever-increasing frustrating circles for weeks, months and even years. Before getting absolutely nowhere . And the worst part is: That's the intention . The 5 D's 1) Delay 2) Defer 3) Deny 4) Defend 5) Dismissed They're largely self-explanatory, but it's an absolute playbook that they stick to, and apparently senior agency bureaucrats and Ministers and their staff are taught this as a rite of passage into parliamentary and career public "roles" . . . and then are sworn to secrecy over it, in a manner that almost has "Eyes Wide Shut" secret society overtones to it. You NEVER refer to the '5 D's' outside of the walls of inner sanctums. However, I'd add two more "D"s to their list: The sixth: Deaf (as in, Ignore). The seventh: Dumb .. And oh my goodness, let me count the ways (which I will do in further articles in this Series, in specific, detailed and named examples). So between your introduction herein to the 'D's', and my ongoing and, I hope, enlightening, series for your continuing and essential edification regarding How Wellington Really Works, I trust that you'll end up knowing how to deal with this sordid scene in a more strategic manner, for a less infuriating time, and maybe even with an outcome. Although there's no guarantee that any "outcome" won't be no outcome. Because that's almost always their intention. Oh, and I do hope that my pieces actually do become an ongoing series, because they do "hit men" (of sorts), too. Yeah, really. Paid generously (with your money, by the way) to "remove" "difficult" ( their words; not mine) individuals. Like me. Stay tuned. See you again shortly. I hope. (PS: I think a feel a book coming on.) COMING NEXT : A drill-down on each of the 'D's. And next up after that: The detailed argument I'll put to the private sector on why hiring an ex-bureaucrat is a very bad idea ( Hint: You might think it gives you in-house lobbyist power and back-door influence, but the price you'll pay is the '5D' customer service anti-culture they'll foster throughout your organisation. Even IF you keep them away from the frontline, it will happen by osmosis anyway. And faster than you think. The worst part? The longer you keep them, the more irreversible the damage they'll seed in your culture. Which then hits your brand. And so on. So, to C-suites everywhere, this will be a read you NEED .
by Jordan Kelly 25 May 2025
Thousands Sign Up to 'Better Wellington' Movement, Seeking Urgent Cessation to Unaffordable Rates, Economic Decay and 'Wrong Direction' of City Council
by Jordan Kelly 20 May 2025
To the Silly Old Placard-Waving (& Terrorist-Supporting) Fools . . . As Seen Daily On the Corner of Chapel & Perry Streets in Masterton
by Jordan Kelly 18 May 2025
** READERS: SEE UPDATE AT END OF ARTICLE. - The Ed. ** Dear MDC Management, Do You Have Any Standards for Your Call Centre Contractors?
by Jordan Kelly 14 May 2025
Cheap Trumps Standards, Ethics & Compassion . . . Apparently
by Jordan Kelly 13 May 2025
A Massive Upside IF It's Done Right . . . and An Unrecoverable Downside It It's Not
by Jordan Kelly 13 May 2025
There's A Whole Different Way to Conduct Polls & Opinion-Gathering that Deserves Investigating
Show More