It's Basic Maths, New World: $9.50 + $9.07 = $18.57. NOT $28.07.
Jordan Kelly • 25 July 2024

An Honest Mistake, But A Costly One Probably Being Made Regularly . . . At the Cost of Shoppers and to the Benefit of the Supermarkets

You might want to make sure you ask for your supermarket till receipts - and check them - as much of an embuggerance as that is for most people.


Last night, I visited New World in Masterton. I bought a piece of salmon for $9.50 and a serving of potato bake for $9.07.


The total, as displayed on the EFTPOS device? $28.07.


I know it's been a long time since I went to school, and there's all kinds of screwy stuff being promoted in today's curricula, but I'm pretty sure most of us would agree that, in reality, $9.50 + $9.07 still equals $18.57.


Only, last night it didn't. According to New World's EFTPOS machine, it equalled $28.07.


Now, I know what happened. I heard it. That unnecessarily loud beeping mechanism that beeps with the ringing up of each item, beeped twice when the salmon was passed over the check-out operator's bar code reader.


Quite apart from that, with only two items, you don't actually have to have high-level real-time arithmetic skills to process such a large anomaly.


So I had the issue fixed immediately; no problem.


Except . . . I think there IS a problem. And it probably relates to ALL supermarkets. Because how often does that happen, and how often does it happen in the context of a much larger trolley of goods where the shopper would never notice . . . unless they checked their till receipt?


I suggest it happens more frequently than the average supermarket chain would like to admit. Because I was at Countdown in Masterton a couple of weeks ago, and while I was bagging up my own groceries, a fairly hot-under-the-collar bloke came in and presented the check-out operator with his till receipt, which showed the same sort of anomaly.


So, come on, supermarket chains and local franchisees, it's up to YOU to make sure you get on top of this. It might be in your own interests not to, but it's about time you DID, out of ethical responsibility to your customers.



Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 10 October 2025
Whether Contemptuous & Corrupt, Sheer Incompetent, Or 'All of the Above' You Just Prevented This (And Probably More Than One) Ratepayer from Exercising Their Legal Right to Vote
by Jordan Kelly 29 September 2025
BAD, Tech On Road, VERY VERY BAD !! Did You Ever Hear of That Classic Retailer Ad, 'It's The Putting It Right That Counts' ? Obviously Not.
by Jordan Kelly 8 September 2025
And so to the next instalment of the Masterton District Council's Malarkey . . .
by Jordan Kelly 31 August 2025
Before You Vote for More of the Same Contempt from Your Local 'Elected Representatives', See If Any Care About YOU, the Ratepayer . . . Because When You Need Them, You Might Be Highly Disappointed.
by Jordan Kelly 17 August 2025
'Where There Is No Vision, the People Shall Perish' . . . Proverbs 29:18
by Jordan Kelly 13 August 2025
If I owned a retail business, I'd hire these two away in a heartbeat . . .
by Jordan Kelly 13 August 2025
The Clown Show that Dominated Parliament on this Day . . .
by Jordan Kelly 22 July 2025
Definition of 'Corruption' MUST Include Dishonest, Seedy, Cruel, Underhanded & Highly Damaging Practices of Ministers & Ministry Management and Personnel
by Jordan Kelly 19 July 2025
When Will You Wake Up to the Biological Impacts of Your Wi Fi Router & Your Smart Phone etc . . . (and just so you know your editor isn't a hypocrite: I manage to live without both . . . yeah, WOW, eh?)
by Jordan Kelly 17 July 2025
Taking It to the Powers That Maybe Shouldn't Be?
Show More