It's Basic Maths, New World: $9.50 + $9.07 = $18.57. NOT $28.07.
Jordan Kelly • 25 July 2024

An Honest Mistake, But A Costly One Probably Being Made Regularly . . . At the Cost of Shoppers and to the Benefit of the Supermarkets

You might want to make sure you ask for your supermarket till receipts - and check them - as much of an embuggerance as that is for most people.


Last night, I visited New World in Masterton. I bought a piece of salmon for $9.50 and a serving of potato bake for $9.07.


The total, as displayed on the EFTPOS device? $28.07.


I know it's been a long time since I went to school, and there's all kinds of screwy stuff being promoted in today's curricula, but I'm pretty sure most of us would agree that, in reality, $9.50 + $9.07 still equals $18.57.


Only, last night it didn't. According to New World's EFTPOS machine, it equalled $28.07.


Now, I know what happened. I heard it. That unnecessarily loud beeping mechanism that beeps with the ringing up of each item, beeped twice when the salmon was passed over the check-out operator's bar code reader.


Quite apart from that, with only two items, you don't actually have to have high-level real-time arithmetic skills to process such a large anomaly.


So I had the issue fixed immediately; no problem.


Except . . . I think there IS a problem. And it probably relates to ALL supermarkets. Because how often does that happen, and how often does it happen in the context of a much larger trolley of goods where the shopper would never notice . . . unless they checked their till receipt?


I suggest it happens more frequently than the average supermarket chain would like to admit. Because I was at Countdown in Masterton a couple of weeks ago, and while I was bagging up my own groceries, a fairly hot-under-the-collar bloke came in and presented the check-out operator with his till receipt, which showed the same sort of anomaly.


So, come on, supermarket chains and local franchisees, it's up to YOU to make sure you get on top of this. It might be in your own interests not to, but it's about time you DID, out of ethical responsibility to your customers.



Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 29 January 2026
A Choreographed Collapse: Top-Up Doping-on-Demand to Convince An Owner their Pet Suddenly Needs 'Euthanased'
by Jordan Kelly 29 January 2026
If You Ever Need to Dig Into What Really Happened with Your Pet's Treatment, You Need to Know What to Ask for . . . Especially If You're Dealing with A Massey-Level Deception
by Jordan Kelly 29 January 2026
The Calculated Destruction of A Beloved Pet (MINE) In the Cover-Up of Malpractice with So Many Clinically Reckless Fail Points that No Sane Owner Would EVER Entrust Their Pet to Massey University's Companion Animal 'Hospital', If They Knew This . . . So Read On.
by Jordan Kelly 29 January 2026
BREAKING: LATEST UPDATE] MASSEY WITHHOLDS INCRIMINATING FOOTAGE FOLLOWING DISCOVERY OF ICU CRUELTY. Formal Complaint Filed with Privacy Commissioner to Force Full Release.
by Jordan Kelly 29 January 2026
Your Pet Is NOT Massey's Property and Is NOT A Disposable Training Aid. He or She Is A Sentient Being . . . and He or She Is YOURS (And You're Paying Through the Nose for His or Her 'Care'.)
by Jordan Kelly 24 January 2026
Morality through Transparency: Restoring Sovereignty & Control to the Pet Parent
by Jordan Kelly 22 January 2026
Algorithmic Truth: Critical Evaluation of the Clinical Narrative Through Forensic AI Analysis
by Jordan Kelly 22 January 2026
My Precious Little Boy Died Needlessly, In Intense Physical, Mental & Emotional Agony . . . Under the Pretences of A False Diagnosis to Enable His 'Disposal' . . . Which the Massey 'Vet' (So Called) Had Me Not Only Consent to, But Actively Participate In
by Jordan Kelly 22 January 2026
Statutory Accountability: Invoking NZ Privacy Act 2020 Section 58 to Pierce the Institutional 'Black Box'
Show More