Readers following the coverage of my attempts to get to the bottom of what happened to my beloved little dog, Harry, with whom I was extraordinarily closely bonded, will know that: (A) The rot in Massey University’s Companion Animal “Hospital” (CAH) runs deep. (B) Honestly and transparency is not their policy. Denial, dismissal, stonewalling and legal threats and intimidation are. (C) Animals aren’t safe there, cruelty is embedded in “care”, and your property (as you r pet legally is) isn’t considered your property at all, as far as Massey, its CAH staff and management are concerned. Your pet is theirs; to do with as they wish. If that involves catastrophic levels of unauthorised, contraindicated, convenience sedation to facilitate their use of your pet in monetised student video collections (including on private cell phones, and to which you will be given no access), this, too, according to Massey is its own God-given right and “best practice” Standard Operating Procedures. (D) “Informed Consent” has a very different meaning in the Massey playbook to that which is generally deemed its accepted definition. (E) “Accountability” is a foreign concept and not one which they have any intention of becoming acquainted with. (F) Laws – including those governing animal welfare, property conversion and more – are not only optional, in Massey’s case, they don’t apply. You know all that. You’ve read about it here, here, here, here, here, here and in most of my other now 30+ articles covering the numerous different sub-atrocities within the overall atrocity that was the demise and disposal of my precious little Harry. What you didn’t yet know – because I didn’t yet know – is that record and evidence tampering (which, for any other New Zealand citizen, at the individual level, -not institutional level in this case - would attract jail time of up to seven years under the Crimes Act): Section 258 (Altering document with intent to deceive) or Section 260 (Falsifying registers).and/or a $10,000 fine under thee Privacy Act (Privacy Act): Section 212(2)(b).is also part of the “we’re exempt” culture of Massey and its veterinary “hospital”. But back to what readers do know for a moment: You’ll know that I’ve been in a battle of battles for the past two months to extract Harry’s full records (or anything approaching them) from Massey’s Legal and Governance department. HOWEVER . . . there was one thing I hadn’t known how to decipher that they actually had drip-fed to me: the Vision VPM Audit Log Report. I’ve been learning a lot about veterinary science, record-keeping, and law in general lately. Not because I wanted to. But because if you want to figure out how deep the rot really runs at Massey, you kind of have to. So I’ve learned a bit about how to decipher the Vision VPM transactional metadata. And – despite the fact that the document in question has as much redacted as showing – with ALL staff names and positions redacted, for example, there riddled-with-rot nature of everything in general still left four distinct “smoking gun” entries in these otherwise heavily-redacted WHAT that amounted to one undeniable overall conclusion: these documents – or this one in particular – isn’t a clinical record, so much as it’s a crime scene. Hidden in Plain Sight There are four hidden but key findings it that demonstrate that the entire timeline of Harry’s “experience” and in that hellhole were a fabrication. The plan for his manufacture exit is not so much written into the records, as it is revealed by the tempering with the logs. They lay bare the lead vet’s apparent plan that his life would come to an abrupt end by the pre-scheduled time of 4.56pm on December 1, just four minutes before (what – and this part is an assumption) the new 5pm shift staff came on, and she would have to brief them on a catastrophically overdosed dog – how it happened and why she hadn’t done anything to save him, but had rather doubled down on his overdose when she’d come on shift that morning and then removed his IV fluids and handed him over to “teaching staff” for his misappropriation as a “teaching tool” and the subject of a student video film festival. She wasn’t about to let that happen. But it absolutely WOULD have happened if Harry – the body of evidence – wasn’t neatly despatched before 5pm. Let me explain how the logs lay out her cunning plot. Here’s How It Went Down & Here’s the Logs (and the Tampering) That Prove It.

Harry WAS A Marked Dog. I Had Hoped Massey Vet Staff Couldn't Have Been Any More Wicked Than They'd Already Been Caught Out Being. But YES , Actually, They COULD . 

This Is What Happens When Massey Thinks THEY Own Your Dog & Can Do With Him As They Please (You Just Pay the Invoice) At This Appalling, Unaccountable Veterinary House of Horrors (LATEST PROOF OF 'LAB RAT' TREATMENT HERE )

FOR LATEST INVESTIGATION FINDINGS: GO HERE . My Precious Little Boy Died Needlessly, In Intense Physical, Mental & Emotional Agony . . . After Massive Overdosing, Intense Cruelty & Intentionally False Diagnosis by Massey 'Vet' (So Called) to Enable His 'Disposal' After Lab Rat-Style Experimentation

While my focus is on the 750% overdosing of my precious little dog, Harry, with an unauthorised, contraindicated convenience sedative, his conversion from patient to live specimen, and the subsequent destruction of evidence (HIM), Massey’s focus is on deploying a taxpayer-funded legal hit squad to 'profile' me.

An Expert Contributed Commentary (FOR LATEST INVESTIGATION FINDINGS, GO HERE .)

From Lethal Incompetence and Malpractice . . . to Withholding of Life-Saving Corrective Action in Favour of Utilisation As A Teaching Aid . . . to A Fraudulent Diagnosis . . . to A Coerced 'Euthanasia' to Destroy the Evidence . . . to Management Malfeasance At the Highest Levels

FOR LATEST INVESTIGATION FINDINGS, GO HERE : (Note to Readers: Nil response to the below. Looks like the New VC's modus operandi is not about to differ from the institutional stonewalling of the entrenched Massey suits . . . with the culture he has inherited obviously causing him no concern.) Plea to New Vice-Chancellor, Pierre Venter, for Cultural Change & Institutional Integrity in the Interests of Pets, Owners & the Ethics Instilled In Future Veterinarians

Bring It On, Huxley, Dean of 'Veterinary School'. Exposing the Realities of Your 'School' Is the Hill I've Chosen to Die on. So It's the Courage of My Convictions vs the Size of Your Legal Budget.