Aussie Banks Exposed for Fee Overcharges; Forced to Refund Customers
Jordan Kelly • 16 July 2024

Might Be Worth Checking the Accuracy of the Fees YOUR Bank Is Charging YOU

The Australian Big Banking sector is being ordered to refund customers more than $28 million after the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) found that a majority of the big-name banks were (grossly) fee-overcharging low-income Australians who should have had low-fee accounts.


According to a report by the Daily Mail of Australia, the ANZ, Bendigo and Adelaide Bank, Commonwealth Bank and Westpac kept at least two million people in high-fee accounts with steep dishonour and overdraw charges when they could least afford it, ASIC found.


Part of the banks' strategy for keeping customers in unnecessarily high-fee accounts was to have difficult "opt-in" processes for switching to no or low-fee options. In many cases, rural customers wanting to switch account types could only do so if they travelled hundreds of kilometres to their nearest physical branch.


ASIC Commissioner Alan Kirkland revealed the banks had willingly "caused financial distress through avoidable fees and complicated bank processes". He said banks were easily able to identify customers that should have been offered more appropriate account types e.g. customers receiving government benefits. (Under Australia's banking code, such customers are entitled to basic, no or low-fee accounts).


Kirkland said the banks knew exactly what they were up to with these strategies, and it has taken ASIC's intervention to force them to cease and desist these totally unacceptable practices.


ASIC has, as part of the corrective orders given to the banks, instructed that processes be changed to to ensure customers can be automatically switched to a low-fee account without needing to attend a branch in-person with proof of a concession card.

Other News, Reviews & Commentary

by Jordan Kelly 29 January 2026
A Choreographed Collapse: Top-Up Doping-on-Demand to Convince An Owner their Pet Suddenly Needs 'Euthanased'
by Jordan Kelly 29 January 2026
If You Ever Need to Dig Into What Really Happened with Your Pet's Treatment, You Need to Know What to Ask for . . . Especially If You're Dealing with A Massey-Level Deception
by Jordan Kelly 29 January 2026
The Calculated Destruction of A Beloved Pet (MINE) In the Cover-Up of Malpractice with So Many Clinically Reckless Fail Points that No Sane Owner Would EVER Entrust Their Pet to Massey University's Companion Animal 'Hospital', If They Knew This . . . So Read On.
by Jordan Kelly 29 January 2026
BREAKING: LATEST UPDATE] MASSEY WITHHOLDS INCRIMINATING FOOTAGE FOLLOWING DISCOVERY OF ICU CRUELTY. Formal Complaint Filed with Privacy Commissioner to Force Full Release.
by Jordan Kelly 29 January 2026
Your Pet Is NOT Massey's Property and Is NOT A Disposable Training Aid. He or She Is A Sentient Being . . . and He or She Is YOURS (And You're Paying Through the Nose for His or Her 'Care'.)
by Jordan Kelly 24 January 2026
Morality through Transparency: Restoring Sovereignty & Control to the Pet Parent
by Jordan Kelly 22 January 2026
Algorithmic Truth: Critical Evaluation of the Clinical Narrative Through Forensic AI Analysis
by Jordan Kelly 22 January 2026
My Precious Little Boy Died Needlessly, In Intense Physical, Mental & Emotional Agony . . . Under the Pretences of A False Diagnosis to Enable His 'Disposal' . . . Which the Massey 'Vet' (So Called) Had Me Not Only Consent to, But Actively Participate In
by Jordan Kelly 22 January 2026
Statutory Accountability: Invoking NZ Privacy Act 2020 Section 58 to Pierce the Institutional 'Black Box'
Show More